Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Meet the Former Right-Wing Blogger Who Realized Conservatives Are Crazy by Joshua Holland

Friday, May 11th, 2012

 

Joshua Holland / AlterNet

Charles Johnson was among the nation’s leading "anti-jihad" bloggers until he realized that his compatriots were totally nuts.

May 7, 2012 |

For years, Charles Johnson was a prominent right-wing “war-blogger.” On his site, Little Green Footballs, he coined the term “anti-idiotarian,” wrote frequently of a “leftist-Islamist axis,” called Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas “a fanatical, deadly enemy of Western civilization” and inspired the hawkish Israeli journalist Gil Ronen to gush, “If anyone ever compiles a list of Internet sites that contribute to Israel’s public relations effort, Johnson’s site will probably come in first, far above the Israeli Foreign Ministry’s site.” His comments section became an infamous hotbed of xenophobia and wingnuttery.

That was then and this is now. Visit LGF today, and you’ll find posts decrying his former fellow travelers’ knee-jerk Islamophobia, debunking the Breitbrats’ steaming piles of nonsense and defending the Obama administration against scurrilous charges from Fox News. Johnson has undergone a remarkable political transformation over the past five years, but it didn’t come without a cost; he is now among the top targets of the right blogosphere – an apostate drawing an enormous amount of venom from people he once considered his allies.

This week, Charles Johnson appeared on the AlterNet Radio Hour. Below is a lightly edited transcript (you can listen to the whole show here).

Joshua Holland: Charles, I’ll be honest, I used to find you kind of terrifying. Not in a personal way, but as a prominent member of this group of so-called war bloggers. You were prominent in that group. You co-founded Pajamas Media and you were widely credited with helping to bring down Dan Rather after he reported on George W. Bush’s Air National Guard service. You used to be really filled with Islamophobia and xenophobia. James Wolcott of Vanity Fair once compared your site to “a disorganized Nuremberg rally.”

. . .

READ MORE

 

Technorati Tags:

LateWire: UAW Chief Disputes Romney’s Auto Bailout Claims

Thursday, May 10th, 2012

 

UAW Chief Disputes Romney’s Auto Bailout Claims

UAW President Bob King said in a statement that credit for saving Detroit’s automakers should go to Obama and Democrats in Congress… continue

 

From: LateWire

 

Technorati Tags: ,,

Disinformation On Every Front By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Wednesday, May 9th, 2012

 

Disinformation On Every Front

By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Global Research, May 5, 2012

paulcraigroberts.com

URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=30706

Some readers have come to the erroneous conclusion that the Matrix consists of Republican Party disinformation as if there is no disinformation from the left. Others think that propaganda is the business of Obama and the Democrats. In fact, propaganda from the right, the left and the middle are all part of the disinformation fed to americans.


If I may give some examples: The other day Chuck Colson, one of the Nixon officials imprisoned for Watergate crimes, died. This gave NPR the opportunity to relive the Nixon horror.
What precisely was the Nixon horror? Essentially, there was no such thing. Watergate was about President Nixon lying about when he learned about the Watergate burglary.
When Nixon learned about the burglary, he did not act on it prior to his reelection, because he reasoned, rightly, that the Washington Post would blame him for the burglary, although he had nothing to do with it, in the hopes of preventing his reelection.
By going along with a cover-up, Nixon enabled the Washington Post to make an issue of the precise date on which Nixon learned of the burglary. White House tapes indicated that Nixon had learned of the burglary before he said he learned of it. So Nixon had permitted a cover-up and had to go, but what was the real reason?
What was the Watergate burglary? We don’t really know. A group of men including former CIA operatives were hired by the Committee to Re-elect the President to break into a Democratic campaign office in the Watergate complex. We don’t know the purpose of the burglary. Some claim it was to wire-tap the telephones in the belief that the Democratic Party was getting re-election money from communists in Cuba or elsewhere. Others claim that the burglars were looking for a list of call girls, that compromised a White House official, as his fiancee was allegedly one of the call girls.
Looking back from our time during which Bush and Obama have deep-sixed the US Constitution, violated numerous US and international laws, and behaved as if they were caesars unconstrained by any law or any morality, Nixon’s “crimes” appear so trivial as to be unremarkable. Yet, Nixon was driven from office and is regarded as a criminal.
What was Watergate really about?
I doubt we will ever know. But I can offer one possible explanation. Nixon, like John F. Kennedy before him, alarmed the military/security complex with his plans to withdraw US troops from Vietnam (Vietnamization) and his determination to open communication with communist China and improve relations.
As President Eisenhower warned in his last address to the American people, conflict brings power and profit to interest groups that benefit from conflict. Nixon, like Kennedy before him, was perceived as a threat by these powerful interests, because he was working to reduce conflict.
James W. Douglass in his documented book, JFK and the Unspeakable, attributes the assassination of President John F. Kennedy to the CIA, Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Secret Service. Douglas reports that these powerful government institutions were concerned by Kennedy’s refusal to approve Operation Northwoods, to back the CIA’s invasion of Cuba, and to confront the Soviets militarily over the Cuban missile crisis and by Kennedy’s plans to end US military intervention in Vietnam. JFK also told his brother Robert that after his re-election he was going to break the CIA into a thousand pieces.
The right-wing view that Kennedy was too soft to stand up to communism was intensified when it was learned that Kennedy was working with Nikita Khrushchev through back channels to defuse the Cold War. In his “A Strategy of Peace” speech (June 1963), Kennedy announced the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and the suspension of atmospheric nuclear testing.
“What kind of a peace do we seek?,” Kennedy asked. “Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war.” With his words and deeds, President Kennedy made himself into a threat against the interests of the military/security complex.
There was enough suspicion of JFK’s assassination that yet another president assassinated by another “unhinged lone gunman” might raise more eyebrows. Nixon was disliked by the media, which made him a good candidate for political assassination. The Watergate burglary provided the opportunity. The Washington Post did the job with reports of “Deep Throat” meeting with reporters in spooky underground parking lots after midnight. Little, if any, information of consequence was contained in these reports. Instead, the newspaper’s reporting transferred the spooky danger of the deserted parking garages to Nixon and an aura of evil was attached to Nixon that eroded his support.
It is interesting that it is only presidents who work to reduce conflict who become targets for assassination. Reagan’s anti-Soviet rhetoric was strong enough to fool the left-wing, but the military-security complex knew of Reagan’s intention to end the Cold War. The CIA, formerly headed by Reagan’s vice president, opposed Reagan’s plan to put the pressure of an arms race on the creaking Soviet economy. The CIA argued that the centrally planned Soviet economy allowed the Kremlin to control investment and that the Communist Party could allocate whatever percentage of Soviet GDP to the military as was needed to win the arms race. In other words, the CIA argued that the US would lose the arms race if Reagan raised the stakes as a means of bringing the Soviets to negotiate the end of the Cold War. Did the CIA really believe this, or was the military/security complex trying to keep the profitable Cold War stalemate going?
Washington cannot exist without conflict. Now that the “Muslim threat” is wearing thin, Washington is stirring up a conflict with China. Washington is sticking its nose into every dispute China has with its neighbors and building up its military presence in the Asian-Pacific. As I wrote in my previous column, a China threat is being created as a long-term threat to take the place of the former Soviet threat.
Moving on to another topic, americans are told that education is the answer to unemployment. Get that university degree and live happily every after.
As RT recently reported, the truth is that more than half of recent US university graduates are unemployed or very underemployed. So much for the mantra that “education is the answer.”
“Education is the answer” serves the colleges and universities who want the tuition payments. It serves the companies who make student loans. It helps the offshoring corporations disguise that they are the main cause of unemployment.
Education is not the answer when high value-added, high wage manufacturing and professional service jobs, such as software engineering, are moved offshore in order to enhance short-term profits for shareholders and multi-million dollar bonuses for CEOs, while domestic employment and purchasing power are destroyed. Unless American university graduates can emigrate to China and India, there is no one to employ them. Yet, we still hear the call to run up student loan debts beyond the ability of salaries to repay the loans.
Professional tradable service employment in the US is so scarce that the University of Florida has abolished its computer science department. As few of the graduates can find employment, the university has reallocated the department’s budget to football, a paying sport.
Americans plugged into the Matrix are programmed to believe that they have correct information provided by a varied and “independent media.” In fact the media is owned by 5 or 6 mega-media companies run by corporate advertising executives and Washington.
Recently, Bloomberg gave us the report that “Japan, Denmark and Switzerland are among the countries to rally this week to [IMF chief] Lagarde’s call for a bigger lending capacity beyond the current $380 billion to shield the world economy against any deepening of Europe’s debt turmoil.”
This Bloomberg report is nonsensical. The loans are not shielding the world economy. The loans are shielding the private banks from their own mistakes at the expense of the world economy. The Bloomberg report shows how completely the Western media is involved in forcing ordinary peoples to subsidize private bankers. It could not be more clear; yet, there is no embarrassment at Bloomberg for serving as the bankers’ propagandist.
Indeed, there is only honor. Serving the Matrix is where lie the rewards. Those who oppose the Matrix are the outcasts whose efforts might, as in the film, save the race of humans from the domination of evil, or else, if they lose, confine the outcasts to prosecution and death.
Across every front Americans are fed lies. The official media line is that the Japanese Fukushima nuclear threat from the earthquake and aftermath is well contained and over. However, the fact of the matter appears to be that an amazing radioactive inventory of both spent and unused fuel rods is in damaged cooling pools that could suffer collapse at any time (especially if there is another earthquake), thus releasing enormous radioactivity (reference link). This possibility presents a greater threat than the initial molten cores of the reactors themselves. Michael Chossudovsky points out that the media is yet to acknowledge the widespread contamination resulting from the Fukushima disaster, and there may be worse to come.
But who cares? Back to the Matrix and the “reality show.”

 

LateWire: Romney Taking Credit For Auto Industry Success

Wednesday, May 9th, 2012

 

Romney Taking Credit For Auto Industry Success

The presidential candidate said Obama merely followed his lead on managing the Big 3, and that he deserves "a lot of credit" for recent successes… continue

 

From: LateWire

 

Technorati Tags: ,

Congressman Paul’s Texas Straight Talk: Enduring Commitments Abroad

Tuesday, May 8th, 2012

 

Monday, May 7, 2012

Enduring Commitments Abroad

“Last week President Obama made a surprise pre-dawn trip to Afghanistan to mark the one year anniversary of the killing of Osama bin Laden and to sign a document further extending the US presence in that country. The president said, “we’re building an enduring partnership…As you stand up, you will not stand alone.” What that means in practice is that the US will continue its efforts to prop up the government in Afghanistan for another ten years beyond the promised withdrawal date of 2014.

To those of us who believe the US should leave Afghanistan immediately, the president retorted, “We must give Afghanistan the opportunity to stabilize.” But how long will that take, when we have already fought the longest war in our nation’s history at incredible human and economic cost to the nation and no end is in sight?”

Click here for the full article: http://bit.ly/IS30Th

 

Technorati Tags: ,

Weekly Wastebasket – Death Star Defense

Monday, May 7th, 2012

 

Death Star Defense

Hey, budget-watchers bored by the slow pace of Congress in this electoral year, guess what: Star Wars is back, and it’s playing at a theater near you! (Well, C-SPAN anyway).

This drama, complete with lasers and spaceships, is unfolding in the House of Representatives. It started last week when members of the Armed Services Committee released their subcommittee’s markup of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The NDAA maps the policy plan for all “national defense” spending, which consists mostly of the Defense Department (DOD) and Energy Department’s nuclear weapons budgets.

Each of the seven subcommittees added and cut some questionable things from the White House budget request, but the dollars really flew in the Strategic Forces Subcommittee. Chaired by Rep. Michael Turner (R-OH), the subcommittee—which oversees missile defense, nuclear weapons, and military space programs—boldly went where spending had not gone before, adding billions to already wasteful defense programs in the process. Highlights include:

  • $356 million for the Ground-based Midcourse Defense System. This system of missile silos based in Alaska and California theoretically intercepts missiles from Iran and North Korea before they reach the U.S. But the last two flight tests failed, and the system hasn’t had a successful test since December 2008. We have told DOD to freeze all new funding for the system until the technology proves itself. DOD cut about $250 million from last year’s $1.16 billion budget for the system, which piqued Turner so much he added the money back with some extra for good measure. The subcommittee turned up the volume further by requiring an intercept test with an intercontinental ballistic missile (previously unattempted) by the end of 2013. Even the Jedi mind trick couldn’t convince us this will work.
  • $100 million as a down payment on a multi-billion effort to build a missile defense site on the East Coast. As if one dysfunctional ground system isn’t enough, this provision requires the Secretary of Defense to conduct an assessment of possible locations by the end of 2013 and make the site operational no later than December 2015.
  • $4.3 billion for maintaining two extra nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines. The subcommittee requires a minimum of 12 ballistic missile submarines in the fleet. The FY13 DOD budget request cuts the current fleet of 12 to 10 for a short period while replacement subs are developed. Yet only eight submarines are needed to carry the maximum number of warheads allowed under the New START treaty. Cutting the fleet to eight would also save serious money in a program already projected to cost $350 billion, more than the Navy’s entire shipbuilding budget.
  • $200 million to make the new long-range strike bomber nuclear-capable. DOD planned to delay this step until later in the program’s development in order to control costs, which are already spiraling into the billions of dollars. The subcommittee required the Air Force to make certain that the bomber be able to carry nuclear weapons from the get-go.
These cuts have to be paid for elsewhere in the subcommittee budget, and members did cut funding for one turkey—the Medium Extended Altitude Defense System (MEADS)—but the system was already pronounced dead, so this was hardly a show of fiscal courage.

Why such theatrics in an election year when no budget bills are likely to reach the President’s desk? It’s the same old kabuki dance: Republicans want to express displeasure with the administration’s budget, and missile defense and nuclear weapons are traditional areas of discord between the two parties’ national security policy platforms. But we can’t afford to play partisan politics when our budget is in such flabby shape. These provisions should be stripped from the NDAA when the full committee votes on it next week. May the force be with us.

###
Let us know what you think.

To keep up with the latest TCS news, follow us on Twitter: twitter.com/taxpayers Facebook: facebook.com/taxpayers and Youtube: youtube.com/taxpayersvideo
Learn how Congress can exceed $1.5 trillion in cuts!

Donate Today

Contribute by mail with this Printer-Friendly Form

Going on at Taxpayer.net This Week

TCS Earmark Databases
TCS in the News

TCS was cited in dozens of stories this past week. Check them all out in the Headlines About TCS section of our website.

Notable Quote
“There shouldn’t be a division, a political division, between those who want to cut spending and those who want to raise revenue, if the way we get that revenue is by cutting tax expenditures.”
Martin Feldstein, a top adviser to President Reagan, arguing that lawmakers should agree on limiting tax credits and deductions as a means of deficit reduction.

Got a quote or article about wasteful spending you think should be featured in the wastebasket? Send us your ideas and comments

From: Weekly Wastebasket www.taxpayer.net