Wednesday, August 31, 2005
By NIGEL CAMERON
GUEST COLUMNIST
In all the scores of editorials and news stories about using “spare” in vitro fertilization embryos for stem cell research, writers continue to talk “the Bush ban on stem-cell research.” It’s amazing how badly it gets the story wrong.
Stem cell research is forging ahead, and funded by the feds. “Adult” stem cell research, using these amazingly versatile cells taken harmlessly from umbilical cord blood and adults, is leading to cures in dozens of clinical trials — funded by the federal government.
And there is no embryo research “ban.” There isn’t even a “ban” on funding. In fact, President Bush is the first president ever to use federal funds for research on embryos.
In that famous August 2001 speech, he liberalized existing policy — and was criticized by some Christian conservatives for doing so. He announced funding for research on cell lines from embryos that already had been destroyed. It was a principled compromise, and the National Institutes of Health is now spending tens of millions of dollars every year following through — although, despite the hype, we are a long, long way from any “cures” using embryo stem cells.
The current fight is about whether to use federal dollars to fund experiments using “spare” embryos from in vitro clinics. There is no federal law preventing researchers from using the embryos with private funding. The president has promised to veto a bill that would overturn his compromise and force taxpayers who believe using human embryos for medical research is a grave wrong to fund it.
There is much interest in “alternative” ways of getting embryonic-type or “pluripotent” stem cells (cells that can become any type of tissue in the body) — ways that don’t involve destroying embryos.
Complete article at:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/238635_stemcellop.html