NEW PULSE POSTED
http://www.ornl.gov/news/pulse/pulse_v233_07.htm
That’s the url to the April 23, 2007, issue of DOE Pulse. Pulse is a newsletter about accomplishments at the Department of Energy’s national laboratories. Here is some of what you’ll find in this issue:
* Brookhaven: Lyme disease vaccine
* Fermilab: MiniBooNE solves neutrino question
* Idaho: Concealed weapons detectors
* Argonne: Flexible electronics
Feature: Lawrence Livermore’s stellar simulations
Researcher profile: NETL’s adventurous David Tucker
==========
O’Reilly falsely claimed he “went on facts and facts alone” in his statements supporting Iraq war
On the April 24 edition of Fox News’ The O’Reilly Factor, host Bill O’Reilly denied the assertion by Marvin Kalb, lecturer in Public Policy at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and a senior fellow at the school’s Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, that prior to, and during, “the first year or even two after the [Iraq] war got started, Fox and many other people associated with Fox … said all kinds of things in support of the war, which were not being borne out by the facts.” O’Reilly replied: “No, I didn’t. I went on facts and facts alone.” In fact, in the lead-up to, and following, the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, O’Reilly made several false claims and misleading suggestions regarding the threat posed by Iraq. Notably, O’Reilly repeatedly suggested a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda, despite numerous reports undermining this claim.
Read more
http://mediamatters.org/items/dailyemail/200704270011?src=other
==========
Iraqi Oil Min Warns Companies Against Deals Bypassing Central Govt
26 Apr 2007
Iraq’s Oil Minister Hussein al-Shahristani Thursday warned international oil companies from signing oil contracts that bypass the federal government in Baghdad and the Oil Ministry, in a clear reference to deals signed by the Kurdistan Regional Government with a number of foreign firms. “Foreign companies shouldn’t sign any contract that isn’t through the federal government (in Baghdad) and the oil ministry,” al-Shahristani said in a statement handed to reporters. “Any contract that is signed without the knowledge of the federal government is illegal,” the minister said. “The ministry warns companies against violating the Iraqi laws and they would be responsible of such behavior,” the minister said.
Read more
http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=44417
==========
Tenet: CIA warned of ‘anarchy’ in Iraq
27 Apr 2007
The CIA warned the Bush White House seven months before the 2003 Iraq invasion that the U.S. could face a thicket of bad consequences, starting with “anarchy and the territorial breakup” of the country, former CIA Director George Tenet writes in a new book. CIA analysts wrote the warning at the start of August 2002 and inserted it into a briefing book distributed at an early September meeting of President [sic] Bush’s national security team at Camp David, he writes.
Read more
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070427/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/tenet_iraq_5
==========
We’ve Been Surging For Years: More troops in Iraq than reported The total comes to 300,000 to 360,000, more than twice the “official” figure.
by Don Monkerud
Global Research, April 27, 2007
tompaine.com – 2007-04-06
The U.S. uses a number of deceptions, definitional illusions and euphemisms, including counting only “combat forces” and “military personnel,” to drastically undercount the number of U.S. forces involved in Iraq, which are at least twice the number as those quoted in the media.
Even President Bush’s January announcement of a “surge” of 21,500 U.S. troops, opposed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has now morphed into 30,000 troops with an additional “headquarters staff” of 3,000, although the currently reported total U.S. military in Iraq is 145,000.
The number of U.S. forces reported by the government, required to occupy a country slightly more than twice the size of Idaho, hides the true extent of vast U.S. resources invested in personnel, material and other costs. The real number is almost impossible to find in government released information even with a great amount of interpretation.
According to GlobalSecurity.org, a public policy organization that provides background information on defense and homeland security, keeping track of American forces has become “significantly more difficult as the military seeks to improve operational security and to deceive potential enemies and the media as to the extent of American operations.” According to John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org, there are a number of other reasons affecting the accurate counting of the number of military forces involved in Iraq. Large numbers of troops are activated with unspecified duties to unspecified areas; many small units from various locations are being mobilized from the army and national guard, which count units differently; and groups rotate in and out of Iraqi so quickly it’s impossible for anyone but the Pentagon to calculated how many are there. The Pentagon tracks these numbers, but Pike says they aren’t telling.
“We only try to nail the numbers down when we think Americans are getting ready to blow someone up,” Pike says. “The Pentagon knows the numbers and we have certainly not done anything to highball it. Certainly, if there’s a chance to release or hold numbers, they are parsimonious.”
Additionally, private enterprise military “contractors” almost double the number of U.S. forces in Iraq. After four contractors were hung from a bridge in Fallujah in March 2004, the Bush Administration stonewalled congressional efforts to force the Pentagon to release information about the number of contractors in Iraq. Finally, the Pentagon reported a total of 25,000.
In “The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security,” Deborah D. Avant, director for the Institute for Global and Internal Studies at George Washington University, reports that official numbers are difficult to find, but “This is the largest deployment of U.S. contractors in a military operation.” In October, the military’s first census of contractors totaled 100,000, not counting subcontractors, and in February 2007, AP reported 120,000 contractors (which would put Bush’s “surge” closer to 50,000).
…
Complete article at:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MON20070427&articleId=5503
From: www.GlobalResearch.ca
==========
A RELIABLE RIP-OFF
Volume XII No. 6 – April 27, 2007
As the federal budget wends its way through the nation’s capital, an optimistically named program tucked deep in the Department of Energy’s budget is attracting a lot of attention. The Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW)
http://capwiz.com/taxpayer/utr/1/BSNTHBOCHC/HQCGHBOCNS/1165091411
would be the first nuclear weapon produced by the U.S. government in two decades, at a cost to taxpayers of $89 million in 2008 alone.
New nukes are a bad investment right now, though, because nobody has defined the role nuclear weapons will play in the post-Cold War world. The National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) wants Congress to fund RRW as a down payment on an expansive program to overhaul the nation’s nuclear complex, an endeavor that would stretch over decades and could likely cost hundreds of billions of dollars. Yet neither the Department of Defense nor the White House has said how many weapons the U.S. needs in the future or how they would be used.
NNSA has floated a raft of reasons why the RRW is necessary, most of them formulated by scientists at federally funded laboratories struggling to rationalize their existence. They argue that warhead components such as plutonium have a limited shelf life, but a Department of Defense scientist advisory board says (pdf) the plutonium will be viable for at least another 50 years.
Another argument is that RRWs would result in a smaller and less expensive nuclear complex by cutting back on Cold War “high-yield” warheads in exchange for one that is simpler and cheaper to maintain. However, a recent report by the American Association for the Advancement of Science found that the RRW program would require a significant initial investment for new, expensive plutonium pit production facilities. But any savings would only accrue decades from now, since NNSA must continue refurbishing existing warheads until their replacements are built.
Unfortunately, DOE’s larger plan for consolidating the stockpile, dubbed “Complex 2030” for its target completion year, is also untethered to fiscal reality. DOE estimates Complex 2030 would cost $150 billion, a figure the Government Accountability Office criticized (pdf) as low, pointing out that “NNSA has had difficulty developing realistic, defensible cost estimates, especially for large complex projects.” The DOE champions consolidating production, storage and maintenance of nuclear weapons, yet rejected a plan for a Consolidated Nuclear Production Center. Rep. David Hobson (R-OH), one of the RRW program’s initial boosters, responded (pdf) that “RRW is a deal with Congress, but the deal requires a serious effort by the Department to modernize, consolidate, and downsize the weapons complex. Absent that, there is no deal.”
Congress has already appropriated $60 million for RRW and the administration has requested $89 million in this year’s budget, even though DOE has yet to taxpayers what the total cost of the project will be. The agency plans to produce a detailed estimate by the end of the year—after the FY 08 spending bills are put to bed. By then, taxpayers will already be out $149 million, with very little to show for it. And you can bet DOE will be back next year asking for more. Money for new nukes without a real plan for how to use them: That’s no way to make us more secure.
Going on at Taxpayer.net This Week
New Democratic Congress is Raking in the Campaign Cash
http://capwiz.com/taxpayer/utr/1/BSNTHBOCHC/OHHVHBOCNY/1165091411
Rep. Murtha (D-PA) Outpaces the Fundraising Field: Most Donations Came from Companies With Business Before his Committee (Excel file)
http://capwiz.com/taxpayer/utr/1/BSNTHBOCHC/BWQUHBOCNZ/1165091411
TCS Analysis of the Emergency Spending Bill that Congress Just Sent to the President
http://capwiz.com/taxpayer/utr/1/BSNTHBOCHC/ECIAHBOCOA/1165091411
TCS in the News
More than the war rides on funding bill (Marketplace)
Federal Probes Target Intelligence Lawmakers (ABC News)
Money Rolls For Approps Democrats (Roll Call) (sub. req.)
Your Turn: Tongass roads waste our money (St. Cloud Times, Minnesota)
Baird seeks more open Congress (Oregonian)
House Passes WRDA Measure Over White House Objections (National Journal’s CongressDaily) (sub. req.)
California Rep. Doolittle leaves House appropriations seat (Los Angeles Times)
House passes delayed water projects bill (Associated Press)
In Deepwater (Economist)
Notable Quote
“While we pursue these ideas and others to get politics and policy back into balance, ultimately we need leaders who see public service as a calling and not a profit center for either themselves or their political allies. A Congress that takes its oversight responsibilities seriously is our best antidote to the unprecedented politicization of government. Furthermore, the media must also continue to shine a bright light on government and keep our leaders honest and accountable. That vigorous oversight ought to extend to the next Administration, whether it be Democratic or Republican, and to the Congress.”
–Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL), at the Brookings Institution, April 25, 2007
From: weekly wastebasket at www.taxpayer.net
==========
A failure in generalship
By Lt. Col. Paul Yingling
“You officers amuse yourselves with God knows what buffooneries and never dream in the least of serious service. This is a source of stupidity which would become most dangerous in case of a serious conflict.”
- Frederick the Great
For the second time in a generation, the United States faces the prospect of defeat at the hands of an insurgency. In April 1975, the U.S. fled the Republic of Vietnam, abandoning our allies to their fate at the hands of North Vietnamese communists. In 2007, Iraq’s grave and deteriorating condition offers diminishing hope for an American victory and portends risk of an even wider and more destructive regional war.
These debacles are not attributable to individual failures, but rather to a crisis in an entire institution: America’s general officer corps. America’s generals have failed to prepare our armed forces for war and advise civilian authorities on the application of force to achieve the aims of policy. The argument that follows consists of three elements. First, generals have a responsibility to society to provide policymakers with a correct estimate of strategic probabilities. Second, America’s generals in Vietnam and Iraq failed to perform this responsibility. Third, remedying the crisis in American generalship requires the intervention of Congress.
The Responsibilities of Generalship
…
Complete article at:
http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/2007/05/2635198
==========
Fascist America, in 10 easy steps #5 of 10
From Hitler to Pinochet and beyond, history shows there are certain steps that any would-be dictator must take to destroy constitutional freedoms. And, argues Naomi Wolf, George Bush and his administration seem to be taking them all
Tuesday April 24, 2007
The Guardian
Last autumn, there was a military coup in Thailand. The leaders of the coup took a number of steps, rather systematically, as if they had a shopping list. In a sense, they did. Within a matter of days, democracy had been closed down: the coup leaders declared martial law, sent armed soldiers into residential areas, took over radio and TV stations, issued restrictions on the press, tightened some limits on travel, and took certain activists into custody.
They were not figuring these things out as they went along. If you look at history, you can see that there is essentially a blueprint for turning an open society into a dictatorship. That blueprint has been used again and again in more and less bloody, more and less terrifying ways. But it is always effective. It is very difficult and arduous to create and sustain a democracy – but history shows that closing one down is much simpler. You simply have to be willing to take the 10 steps.
As difficult as this is to contemplate, it is clear, if you are willing to look, that each of these 10 steps has already been initiated today in the United States by the Bush administration.
Because Americans like me were born in freedom, we have a hard time even considering that it is possible for us to become as unfree – domestically – as many other nations. Because we no longer learn much about our rights or our system of government – the task of being aware of the constitution has been outsourced from citizens’ ownership to being the domain of professionals such as lawyers and professors – we scarcely recognise the checks and balances that the founders put in place, even as they are being systematically dismantled. Because we don’t learn much about European history, the setting up of a department of “homeland” security – remember who else was keen on the word “homeland” – didn’t raise the alarm bells it might have.
It is my argument that, beneath our very noses, George Bush and his administration are using time-tested tactics to close down an open society. It is time for us to be willing to think the unthinkable – as the author and political journalist Joe Conason, has put it, that it can happen here. And that we are further along than we realise.
Conason eloquently warned of the danger of American authoritarianism. I am arguing that we need also to look at the lessons of European and other kinds of fascism to understand the potential seriousness of the events we see unfolding in the US.
…
5 Harass citizens’ groups
The fifth thing you do is related to step four – you infiltrate and harass citizens’ groups. It can be trivial: a church in Pasadena, whose minister preached that Jesus was in favour of peace, found itself being investigated by the Internal Revenue Service, while churches that got Republicans out to vote, which is equally illegal under US tax law, have been left alone.
Other harassment is more serious: the American Civil Liberties Union reports that thousands of ordinary American anti-war, environmental and other groups have been infiltrated by agents: a secret Pentagon database includes more than four dozen peaceful anti-war meetings, rallies or marches by American citizens in its category of 1,500 “suspicious incidents”. The equally secret Counterintelligence Field Activity (Cifa) agency of the Department of Defense has been gathering information about domestic organisations engaged in peaceful political activities: Cifa is supposed to track “potential terrorist threats” as it watches ordinary US citizen activists. A little-noticed new law has redefined activism such as animal rights protests as “terrorism”. So the definition of “terrorist” slowly expands to include the opposition.
Complete article at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2064157,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=1
==========
NETWORK HOSTING ATTORNEY SCANDAL E-MAILS ALSO HOSTED OHIO’S 2004 ELECTION RESULTS
By Steven Rosenfeld, Bob Fitrakis, Free Press
Did the most powerful Republicans in America have the computer capacity, software skills and electronic
infrastructure in place on Election Night 2004 to tamper with the Ohio results to ensure George W. Bush’s
re-election?
At:
http://www.alternet.org/stories/50941/
==========
three thousand words
Tom Toles: the real hero of the story
http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/uc/20070426/ltt070426.gif
David Horsey: another judas in out midst!
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/dayart/20070429/cartoon20070429.gif
John Deering: you need the public backing of some former presidents