Archive for October, 2008

Friday October 31, 2008 Halloween – I see, do you still think it’s a meteor, Professor? – Orson Welles broadcasts, on October 30, 1938

Friday, October 31st, 2008

TWENTY FUN THINGS TO DO ON HALLOWEEN

 

1.Give away something other than candy. (Toothpicks, golf balls, bags of sand, etc.)

2.Wait behind the door until some people come. When they get near the door, jump out, wearing a costume, and holding a bag, and yell, “Trick or Treat!” Look at them, scratch your head, and act confused.

3.Fill a briefcase with marbles and crackers. Write on it, “Top Secret” in big letters. When trick-or-treaters come, look around suspiciously, say, “It’s about time you got here,” give them the briefcase, and quickly shut the door.

4.Get about 30 people to wait in your living room. When trick-or-treaters come to the door, say, “Come in.” When they do, have everyone yell, “Surprise!!!” Act like it’s a surprise party.

5.Get everyone who comes to the door to come in and see if they can figure out what’s wrong with your dishwasher. Insist that it makes an unnatural “whirring” sound.

6.After you give them candy, hand the trick-or-treaters a bill.

7.Open the door dressed as a giant fish. Immediately collapse, and don’t move or say anything until the trick-or-treaters go away.

8.When you answer the door, hold up one candybar, throw it out into the street, and yell, “Crawl for it!”

9.When you answer the door, look at the trick-or-treaters, act shocked and scared, and start screaming your head off. Slam the door and runaround the house, screaming until they go away.

10.Insist that the trick-or-treaters each do ten push-ups before you give them any candy.

11.Hand out menus to the trick-or-treaters and let them order their candy. Keep asking if anyone wants to see the wine list.

12.Get a catapult. Sit on your porch and catapult pumpkins at anyone who comes within 50 yards of your house.

13.When people come to the door, jump out a nearby window, crashing through the glass, and run as far away from your house as you can.

14.Answer the door dressed as a pilgrim. Stare at the trick-or-treaters for a moment, pretend to be confused, and start flipping through a calendar.

15.Instead of candy, give away colored eggs. If anyone protests, explain that the eggs are the only thing you had left over from Easter.

16.Answer the door dressed as a dentist. Angrily give the trick-or-treaters a two-hour lecture on tooth decay.

17.Answer the door with a mouthful of M & M’s and several half-eaten candy bars in your hands. Act surprised, and close the door. Open it again in a few seconds, and insist that you don’t have any candy.

18.Hand out cigarettes and bottles of asprin.

19.Put a crown on a pumpkin and put the pumpkin on a throne on your porch. Insist that all of the trick-or-treaters bow before the pumpkin.

20.Dress up like a bunny rabbit. Yell and curse from the moment you open the door, and angrily throw the candy at the trick-or-treaters. Slam the door when you’re finished.

                          ==========

HALLOWEEN DICTIONARY

Bobbing For Apples: What happens when you leave your bra off while running.

Boogieman: Guy who passes time at a stoplight picking his nose.

Coffin: What you do when you get a piece of popcorn stuck in your throat.

Frankenstein: Hot dog and a mug of beer.

Full moon: What your repairman reveals when he bends over to fix your fridge.

Goblin: How you eat the Snickers bars you got for Halloween.

Invisible Man: What a guy becomes when there’s housework to be done. Also, see “Mr. Hyde.”

Jack O’ Lantern: An Irish Pumpkin.

Jack the Ripper: What Jack does to his lottery tickets after losing each week.

Mummy: Who kisses the boo-boo after you scrape your knee.

Pumpkin Patch: What a pumpkin wears when trying to quit smoking.

Skeleton: Any supermodel. Vampire Bat: What Dracula hits a baseball with.

Witch: See “Mother-in-Law.”

Zombie: What you look like before that first cup of morning coffee.

                          ==========

SIGNS YOUR MOBILE HOME IS HAUNTED

1. Your can of Skoal mysteriously floats through the air.

2. Blood drips out of your simulated wood paneling.

3. The eyes on the velvet Elvis painting move.

4. The room is spinning, and you’re not even drunk yet.

5. That car in your front yard isn’t on blocks. It’s levitating by itself.

6. Your dog, Bo, gets sucked into the TV set, and he’s blocking your view of rasslin’.

7. That mysterious scratching below the floorboards? The Telltale Raccoon.

8. The chain the ghost rattles is attached to his wallet.

9. You feel an eerie presence every time “Freebird” plays on the radio.

10. The trailer is shaking, but there’s no tornado in sight.

11. Your Dale Earndhart bed sheets have eyeholes cut in them.

12. The ghost is completely invisible except for the tobacco juice running down his chin.

13. Mysterious footsteps seem to be stomping out “Achy Breaky Heart.”

14. There’s a funny howlin’ noise comin’ from the corn crib. No wait, that’s just Jimmy.

15. You hear strange moaning. But only during Shania Twain videos.

16. You’re missing four PBR’s, and the missus only drinks Old
Milwaukee.

17. The lights turn on and off even though you paid the power bill.

18. You hear blood-curdling screams, but both neighbors are still in jail.

19. You get a mysterious phone call that says, “I know what you did last NASCAR race.”

20. Instead of saying “Boo,” the ghost says “Boo-ya’ll!”

21. The veneer of window grime looks just like Calvin, and he’s taking a leak on YOU!

22. Instead of naked women, your playing cards, all of a sudden, have
pictures of covered bridges on them.

23. The folks on Jenny Jones discuss domestic problems that eerily resemble your own.

24. You get a creepy feelin’ and it ain’t because that Richard Simmons is on TV.

25. You come home one day and it’s clean.

                          ==========

Security and Auditability of Electronic Voting Machines

PENNY VENETIS, pennyv@kinoy.rutgers.edu,

http://tinyurl.com/62b7gj (www.northjersey.com)

Venetis is plantiff’s counsel in a four-year lawsuit spearheaded by the Constitutional Litigation Clinic at Rutgers School of Law. According to expert reports conducted as a part of the lawsuit, “approximately 10,000 voting machines used in 18 out of the 21 counties in New Jersey can be manipulated to throw an election.” The report concluded that “vote-stealing software can be easily installed in the AVC Advantage [Sequoia electronic voting machines] in less than eight minutes. The technical knowledge needed to write vote-stealing software is widespread and common.”

Venetis said today: “The possibility for disenfranchisement due to voting machine insecurities puts at risk the more than 5 million registered New Jersey voters. It is most unfortunate that the state continues to defend these insecure voting systems.”

From: Institute for Public Accuracy

                          ==========

Explainer: How Bad Are Electronic Voting Machines? Do they really fail one out of five times?

Slate Magazine
http://www.slate.com/id/2203147/

By Nina Shen Rastogi

October 27, 2008

Civil rights groups filed a lawsuit against the Pennsylvania Department of State last week calling for paper ballots to be provided in any precinct where half the voting machines fail on Election Day. The complaint asserts that 10 percent to 20 percent of the direct-recording electronic voting machines used in Pennsylvania are likely to fail on Nov. 4. The machines will be used in 34 percent of counties around the United States. Are they really so bad that they fail one out of five times?

No. The 10 percent to 20 percent figure cited in the Pennsylvania lawsuit is somewhat misleading. The low estimate comes from an opinion piece published by the National Academy of Engineering last year. According to the author, Michael Ian Shamos, “it has been reported anecdotally” that 10 percent of the machines fail “in some respect” on Election Day. That means the machine required some technical intervention, not that it was necessarily taken out of service. The high estimate of 20 percent comes from a 2005 study conducted by the state of California.* In that paper, the authors were testing only one of the six machines used in Pennsylvania—the Diebold (now Premier) AccuVote TSX, a machine whose software has since been updated. Furthermore, 14 of the 34 documented failures were printer jams, which won’t be a problem in Pennsylvania since the state doesn’t produce paper voting receipts.

The fact is that no one really knows how often electronic voting machines fail….

Explainer thanks Matt Bishop of the University of California-Davis, John Gideon of VotersUnite!, JOSEPH LORENZO HALL OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY and Princeton University, Lawrence Norden of the Brennan Center at New York University, Michael Shamos of Carnegie Mellon, and DAVID WAGNER OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY.

                          ==========

Blog: The Vote Grab

Voting machines are unreliable and inaccurate

The Independent [UK]

http://tinyurl.com/5b4ovz (blogs.independent.co.uk)

By Peter Tatchell

October 29, 2008

As early voting in the US presidential elections gets underway, ES&S iVotronics touch-screen electronic voting machines have been observed in four separate states flipping the votes – mostly from Barack Obama to John McCain but sometimes to third party candidates too. This has already occurred during early voting in the states of West Virginia, Tennessee, Missouri and Texas….

This is further evidence that the electronic voting machines that will be used in the 4 November election are not reliable and accurate – that they are prone to malfunction and may not record the actual vote winner….

Research by the UNIVERSITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA, revealed election irregularities in 2004 in Florida. These irregularities, all of which were associated with electronic voting machines, appear to have awarded between 130,000 to 260,000 additional votes to Bush….

                          ==========

EIA, the Nation’s clearinghouse for energy statistics – This Week in Petroleum (TWIP)

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

This Week in Petroleum (TWIP) has been updated to the EIA website:

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/twip/twip.asp

                          ==========

CongressLine: Congress and Money -

Paul Jenks examines how the appropriations process this year has provided a multitude of interesting examples of the wide variety of tools available to Congress and the federal government for appropriating money, beyond just the ordinary appropriations bills in Congress.

http://www.llrx.com/congress/congressandmoney.htm

 

                          ==========

And now for the important news ….

By Argus Hamilton

Miami Dolphins owner Wayne Huizenga vowed to sell his team if Barack Obama wins, rather than pay higher taxes. The NFL owners are all in agreement. It’s bad enough they have to share the wealth with one another, they are not about to take in new partners.
 

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com

                          ==========

three thousand words

Mike Thompson: you want to speak to a loan officer? …

http://img.slate.com/media/84/081028_ed.gif

Cartoon du Jour – By Khalil: gop’s list minute little helpers

http://tinyurl.com/5ua3fu (www.bendib.com)

Matt Davies: Health is Wealth

http://tinyurl.com/59u629 (davies.lohudblogs.com)

Thursday October 30, 2008 – The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer. – Henry Kissinger

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

Voting Machines

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

PAMELA SMITH, pam@verifiedvoting.org, http://VerifiedVoting.org

Smith is president of the Verified Voting Foundation and its sister advocacy organization VerifiedVoting.org. She said today: “Voters should be able to check that their votes were recorded accurately; election officials should be able to prove that votes were counted correctly. Post-election audits of voter-verified paper ballots are the best way to make sure voting systems are working as they should — a potent safeguard on our election process.”

From:  Institute for Public Accuracy

                          ==========

7 Ways to Steal Back Your Vote 

Bulletin
By Greg Palast 

Wednesday, 29 October 2008

1. Don’t don’t don’t Mail In Your Ballot-unless…

For those of you who mailed in your ballot, please tell me, what happened to it? You don’t know, do you? I can tell you that officially, three-fourths of a million absentee ballots were never counted last time, on the weakest of technical excuses. And you won’t even know it. Furthermore, tens of thousands of ballots are not mailed out to voters in time to return them – in which case you’re out of luck. Most states won’t let you vote in-precinct once you’ve applied to vote absentee. Every time I hear of a voter going “absentee” to avoid computer screens, I want to “go postal” myself.

CONTINUE…   http://tinyurl.com/6j5d8a

                          ==========

The Socialism Scare

Recently, the right wing has seized on Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) admission that he wants to “spread the wealth around” as evidence that his tax policies are somehow socialist, communist, or Marxist. Sen. Mel Martinez (R-FL) compared Obama’s policies to those of Cuba, saying, “Where I come from, where I was raised, they tried wealth redistribution. We don’t need that here, that’s called Socialism, Communism, not Americanism.” House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) said, “You want to talk about socialism. You put these people in office, it’s batten down the hatches and watch out.” The media have also piled on, with WFTV Orlando’s Barbara West asking Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) during an interview, “How is Sen. Obama not being a Marxist if he intends to spread the wealth around?” Fox News’ Sean Hannity said Obama has “doubled down on socialism for America,” while Bill O’Reilly admitted that he “wouldn’t have said the Marxism thing” but that Obama nevertheless espouses “quasi-socialism.” All of these conservatives, however, are distorting the Obama plan, which simply makes the American tax system slightly more progressive — an idea that the American public solidly supports.

The Progress Report thinkprogress.org

                          ==========

The Bailout Lie Exposed: Financial “Big Boys” Never Intended To Lend Out Their Windfall

by Prof. Alan Nasser
Global Research, October 28, 2008

In a nationally televised speech on September 24, George W. Bush said  in support of the proposed bailout plan that it was meant to “help American consumers and businessmen get credit to meet their daily needs and to create jobs.”

The Bailout Lie Exposed

Bush’s story was subsequently peddled by the Ministry of Information: the more than 700 billion handed over by the Treasury and the Fed to the financial oligarchy will be used to enable banks to resume lending to strapped households and businesses, thereby enabling the economy to regain healthy rates of growth and households and businesses to elude the prospect of extended debt peonage.

But astute observers knew full well that there can be no “regaining” of robust growth rates that had already disappeared with the onset of Reagan/Thatcher neoliberalism. And reflating the housing bubble by encouraging already maxed-out working people and small businesses to dig themselves into a deeper debt grave seems like a recipe for heightening economic catastrophe. But not to worry: the bad guys were not chimps after all. They had no intention of using the proceeds of the giveaway to lend to anyone. We can thank the New York Times’s surprisingly intrepid economics reporter Joe Nocera for this revelation.

In an unexpected adventure in extra-curricular empiricism, Nocera reported in Saturday’s NYT that he was able to gain access to a recording of an employee-only October 17 conference call by a top (unnamed) executive of JPMorgan Chase, the beneficiary of $25 billion of federal largesse.

At one point in the conference one participant asked whether the $25 billion will “change our strategic lending policy.” The executive then proceeded to spill the beans: “What we do think, it will help us to be a little bit more active on the acquisition side  or opportunistic side for some banks who are still struugling.” Translation: “Say what? Lend to folks up to their ears in debt already?! Do we look like morons?? You know as well as I that breakneck financial consolidation has been the name of the game since the early nineties. So have leveraged buyouts. Only the latter are normally accomplished with private money. Now we get to leverage bank acquisitions  with public money! Is this a deal or is this a deal?”

The executive assures his questioner that JPMC’s voracious appetite for gobbling up debt hawkers was not sated by its recent government-backed digestion of two major competitors: “And I would not assume that we are done on the acquisition side just because of the Washington Mutual and Bear Stearns mergers. I think that there are going to be some great opportunities for us to grow in this environment, and I think we have an opportunity to use that $25 billion in that way, and obviously depending on whether recession turns into depression or what happens in the future, you know, we have that as a backstop.” Moments later the exec speaks openly about Morgan’s intentions regarding loans: “We would think that loan volume will continue to go down as we continue to tighten credit to fully reflect the high cost of pricing on the loan side.”

Was all this taking place behind Paulson’s back? Not at all. In fact, we have decisive evidence that Paulson’s stated rationale for the bailout was sheer mendacity. There was virtually no mention in the mainstream press of Paulson’s move earlier this month to promote the further concentration of bank wealth. He enacted a new multi-billion-dollar tax break allowing an acquiring bank to immediately deduct any losses on the books of the acquired bank. The message is not lost on the Times’s Nocera: “It is starting to appear as if …. Treasury wants banks to acquire each other and is using its power to inject capital to force a new and wrenching round of bank consolidation.”

As venal as this may make Paulson and the political decision makers –most of whom are full aware of the real rationale of the bailout- appear, no one may accuse them of inconsistency. The bailout conveniently imposes no lending requirements on the banks.

The Ongoing Consolidation of Wealth As A Capitalist Tradition

Complete article at:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10724

Alan Nasser is professor emeritus of political economy and philosophy at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington. He can be reached at nassera@evergreen.edu .

                          ==========

DON’T LOOK NOW, THERE’S A HUGE WAVE OF INFLATION COMING TOWARD US

By Kevin Phillips, Huffington Post

Paulson and Bernanke’s “rescue” have only begun to do their full long-term damage.

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/105107/

                          ==========

The Triumph of Ignorance

October 28, 2008
Why morons succeed in US politics.

By George Monbiot. Published in the Guardian 28th October 2008

How was it allowed to happen? How did politics in the US come to be dominated by people who make a virtue out of ignorance? Was it charity that has permitted mankind’s closest living relative to spend two terms as president? How did Sarah Palin, Dan Quayle and other such gibbering numbskulls get to where they are? How could Republican rallies in 2008 be drowned out by screaming ignoramuses insisting that Barack Obama is a Muslim and a terrorist?(1)

Like most people on this side of the Atlantic I have spent my adult life mystified by American politics. The US has the world’s best universities and attracts the world’s finest minds. It dominates discoveries in science and medicine. Its wealth and power depend on the application of knowledge. Yet, uniquely among the developed nations (with the possible exception of Australia), learning is a grave political disadvantage.

There have been exceptions over the past century: Franklin Roosevelt, Kennedy and Clinton tempered their intellectualism with the common touch and survived; but Adlai Stevenson, Al Gore and John Kerry were successfully tarred by their opponents as members of a cerebral elite (as if this were not a qualification for the presidency). Perhaps the defining moment in the collapse of intelligent politics was Ronald Reagan’s response to Jimmy Carter during the 1980 presidential debate. Carter – stumbling a little, using long words – carefully enumerated the benefits of national health insurance. Reagan smiled and said “there you go again”(2). His own health programme would have appalled most Americans, had he explained it as carefully as Carter had done, but he had found a formula for avoiding tough political issues and making his opponents look like wonks.

It wasn’t always like this. The founding fathers of the republic – men like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams and Alexander Hamilton – were among the greatest thinkers of their age. They felt no need to make a secret of it. How did the project they launched degenerate into George W Bush and Sarah Palin?

On one level this is easy to answer. Ignorant politicians are elected by ignorant people. US education, like the US health system, is notorious for its failures. In the most powerful nation on earth, one adult in five believes the sun revolves around the earth; only 26% accept that evolution takes place by means of natural selection; two-thirds of young adults are unable to find Iraq on a map; two-thirds of US voters cannot name the three branches of government; the maths skills of 15 year-olds in the US are ranked 24th out of the 29 countries of the OECD(3).

But this merely extends the mystery: how did so many US citizens become so dumb, and so suspicious of intelligence? Susan Jacoby’s book The Age of American Unreason provides the fullest explanation I have read so far. She shows that the degradation of US politics results from a series of interlocking tragedies.

Complete article at:

http://tinyurl.com/6xq83z  (www.monbiot.com)

                          ==========

Noted Economist Offers ‘Inconvenient Truths’ About Health Care

By John Reichard, CQ HealthBeat Editor

October 24, 2008 — As winning candidates make the transition from campaign promises to the harsh post-election realities of trying to figure out actual health system changes, emeritus professor of economics Victor R. Fuchs of Stanford University advises that their deliberations would be more fruitful if they adopted three “inconvenient truths” as their starting point.

Fuchs argues these truths to be evident: that the growth of all health spending, not just that of government, must be reined in; that advances in medicine are the main reason costs outpace economic growth; and that universal coverage is impossible without “subsidization and compulsion.”

Truth number one, according to Fuchs: “Over the past 30 years, U.S. health care expenditures have grown 2.8 percent per annum faster, on average, than the rest of the economy. If this differential continues for another 30 years, health care expenditures will absorb 30 percent of the gross domestic product—a proportion that exceeds that of current government spending for all purposes combined.

“The negative implications of such increases for the support of education, infrastructure, national security, capital investment, and ordinary consumption would be huge,” he says. Fuchs agrees with former Congressional Budget Office Director Alice Rivlin on what must be done, quoting her as saying, “‘The principal challenge to achieving a sustainable long-run fiscal policy turns out to be reducing the rate of growth of health spending—all health spending, not just the federal or the federal/state portion.’”

Covering the uninsured is “a worthy goal, but without sustained attention to the cost of care, gains in coverage will not be sustainable,” he writes. Now, the United States spends about twice as much per person on health care as the average high-income country, Fuchs notes. “An absolute reduction in that level of spending would be desirable but is not likely. The most tempting targets—’waste,’ ‘fraud,’ and ‘abuse’—have proven remarkably resistant to attack.

“A major reason why it is so difficult to reduce costs is that every dollar of health care spending is a dollar of income to someone involved in providing health insurance or health care.” Administrative costs, insurance company profits, and high executive salaries “are only a small part of the story. The biggest part consists of payments to tens of thousands of telephone and computer operators, claim payers, insurance salespersons, actuaries, benefit managers, consultants, and other low- and middle-income workers.

“Overutilization of care is another problem that is not easily solved, partly because unnecessary or marginally useful tests, prescriptions, operations, and visits generate income for providers,” he says.

More regulation won’t tame administrative expenses or costs from overutilization. “The only way for the country to restrain costs without hurting quality is to make major changes in the way health insurance is financed and the way health care is organized and delivered,” Fuchs says.

Truth number two: “Advances in medicine are the main reason why health care spending has grown 2.8 percent per annum faster than the rest of the economy.”

Advances “in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions have been largely responsible for increases in the length and quality of life. How can we retain most of the health benefits of future medical advances while slowing the rate of growth of health care expenditures?”

Fuchs says that “part of the answer lies in the creation of a large, semi-independent organization—something like Britain’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [NICE] —to evaluate the benefits and costs of new medical interventions.” But such an organization must have steady, substantial funding because of the flood of new tests and treatments each year.

The other part of the answer is that health care organizations “must be willing and able to incorporate the assessments into their daily practice. They must have the information, infrastructure, and incentives to deliver high-quality, cost-effective care,” he says.

Truth number three: “Universal coverage requires subsidies for the poor and those too sick to afford insurance at an actuarially appropriate premium; it also requires compulsion for those who don’t want to help pay for the subsidies or who want a ‘free ride’ expecting that they will get care if they need it.”

“No country achieves universal coverage without subsidization and compulsion,” Fuchs writes, “but U.S. politicians tie themselves in knots by proposing reforms designed to conceal these realities. Politically, the most appealing plans are those that mislead people into thinking that someone else is paying for their insurance.”

But workers are actually paying the costs of coverage in foregone wages. Also, “every dollar the government spends on health insurance must come out of the public’s pocket. If the government is acting responsibly, the money will come in the form of taxes. If irresponsibly, it will be borrowed, creating debts for which future generations will have to tax themselves in order to pay interest and principal.”

“The most efficient, equitable way to achieve universal coverage is to make basic health insurance available to everyone regardless of income, employment status, family circumstances, or other characteristics and to pay for it with a tax roughly proportional to income or consumption. In such a system, the wealthy and the healthy would subsidize insurance for the poor and the sick. Persons of average income and average health would pay enough to cover the cost of their own insurance.”

Ignoring the current state of affairs—which many analysts consider a “mess” because of high costs, the large number of uninsured, and growing expenditures—won’t do, Fuchs says. “The present impasse must give way to recognition that major change will not be an option much longer: it will be a necessity.”

Of course, the trick will be getting powerful players to buy into the truths offered by Fuchs. The medical technology industry, for example, doesn’t see eye to eye with his analysis.

“Professor Fuchs, like the CBO study he cites, overestimates the contribution of medical technology to cost increases and underestimates the negative impact on medical progress of adopting a NICE-like approach to coverage of new treatments,” said David Nexon, senior executive vice president of the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed). “We need to get health care costs under control, but we should do it not by rationing safe and effective technology but by improving management of chronic disease, emphasizing health promotion and disease prevention, and reorienting incentives in the system toward quality and efficiency.”

From:

http://tinyurl.com/65b4y2 (www.commonwealthfund.org)

                          ==========

Op-Ed: Obama Can Cure Health Care’s Ills

Forbes
http://tinyurl.com/5pq8ja

David M. Cutler and J. Bradford DeLong

David M. Cutler, the author of Your Money Or Your Life: Strong Medicine for America’s Health Care System, is the Otto Eckstein professor of applied economics at Harvard’s department of economics and Kennedy School of Government. He is also an adviser on health care to Barack Obama.

J. BRADFORD DELONG, who blogs at

http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/ , is a PROFESSOR OF ECONOMICS AT U.C. BERKELEY. Both authors are research associates at the National Bureau of Economic Research.

October 28, 2008

Every other North Atlantic country spends less than half what we spend on medicine. Every other North Atlantic country is healthier than America.

This extraordinary gap–between how much we spend on health care and what we get for it–is not because our doctors, nurses and pharmacists are unskilled or undedicated. On the contrary, they are the best in the world. But they are embedded in a poorly designed system that gives us low value for our money.

Taking the long view, the inefficiency of our health system is the biggest threat to economic growth over the next two decades–bigger, even, than the current financial crisis. The doubling of health insurance premiums since 2000 has forced employers to choose between cutting wages, cutting benefits and hiring fewer workers. The result is lost profits and lost wages, in addition to pointless risk, insecurity and a flood of personal bankruptcies. Without serious changes, this problem will only get worse.

Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama wants to address the health care crisis head-on. Like Franklin Roosevelt, who faced equally large challenges, Obama will try many strategies and be guided by results, not predetermined ideological conviction…

                          ==========

Borowitz Report – Infomercial Shocker

October 29, 2008

Obama Infomercial to Offer Americans Rock-hard Abs
Candidate Unveils ‘Obamaciser’

Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama will use his thirty-minute infomercial tonight to unveil a new breakthrough in exercise technology that will guarantee all Americans “sexy, rock-hard abs,” the Obama campaign confirmed today.

While most political insiders assumed that Sen. Obama would use the costly airtime to attempt to “close the deal” with the American people, few expected him to include the promise of a sculpted midsection as the keystone of his closing argument.

“This is an issue that cuts across all voting blocs – Democrats, Republicans, independents, you name it,” said Obama strategist David Axelrod.  “Everyone wants well-defined, shredded abs.”

In a clip of the infomercial released to the press, Sen. Obama appears in spandex exercise wear and demonstrates his ab-sculpting machine, called the “Obamaciser.”

“America, you’re probably asking yourselves, ‘Can we really have rock-hard abs?’” Sen. Obama says.  “Repeat after me: Yes we can.”

As Sen. Obama prepared to unveil his revolutionary ab-blasting system, the McCain campaign was rocked by reports that a top McCain adviser referred to his running mate, Alaska governor Sarah Palin, as “a psycho douchebag.”

The controversial comment came one day after a top Palin adviser compared Sen. McCain to “the corpse in ‘Weekend at Bernie’s,’ only less lively.”

Sen. McCain tried to draw attention away from the internecine brouhaha today by announcing that if elected, he would name Joe the Plumber Secretary of State.

“Joe the Plumber is eminently qualified,” Sen. McCain told a crowd in Toledo, Ohio.  “A hell of a lot more qualified than that psycho douchebag.”

Upcoming Events

January 1, 2009 at 12:01AM

Andy’s 2009 Shows
Watch this space for Andy’s performances in 2009.

http://www.borowitzreport.com/

                          ==========

three thousand words

David Horsey: whud you say, boy?!

http://tinyurl.com/5ff5un

Mr. Fish (Dwayne Booth): stick em up, this is a bailout -

http://tinyurl.com/64a7dl

Jack Ohman: I’d like it better if he came down here and apologized

http://tinyurl.com/5lf6yd

Wednesday October 29, 2008 – “Banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies” – Thomas Jefferson

Wednesday, October 29th, 2008

Voting Machines

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

DAN WALLACH, dwallach@cs.rice.edu, druth@rice.edu,

http://www.cs.rice.edu/~dwallach/

Wallach is an associate professor at Rice University and also the associate director of the National Science Foundation’s ACCURATE (A Center for Correct, Usable, Reliable, Auditable and Transparent Elections), a $7.5 million research effort across six different institutions to improve U.S. election systems. He said today: “Present-day electronic voting systems have a variety of security flaws, many of which you have heard about. Of course, we can find problems with any voting system, but the present-day electronic systems enable fraud of a scale and simplicity previously unknown in the administration of elections.”

Wallach added: “Our work [reviewing electronic voting systems in California] found a wide variety of flaws, most notably the possibility of ‘viral’ attacks, where a single corrupted voting machine could spread that corruption, as part of regular processes and procedures, to every other voting system. In effect, one attacker, corrupting one machine, could arrange for every voting system in the county to be corrupt in the subsequent election.”

From: Institute for Public Accuracy

‘Those are in quarantine, and they won’t ever see the light of day.’ Faulty Ballots Sent to D. C. Voters –Mailed absentee ballots are printed on demand by Sequoia for elections board

27 Oct 2008

As many as 126 District voters were mailed incorrect absentee ballots in the latest slip-up for the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, already under scrutiny for mistakes made during the Sept. 9 primary. D.C. Council member Mary M. Cheh (D-Ward 3) says Sequoia Voting Systems, the company that provides the city with its ‘voting’ system and equipment, informed her office that there are at least 126 flawed absentee ballots.

At:

http://tinyurl.com/693hqx  (www.washingtonpost.com)

From: CLG News

                          ==========

Op-Ed: But Have We Learned Enough? 

New York Times
http://tinyurl.com/5btsoc

N. Gregory Mankiw is a professor of economics at Harvard. He was an adviser to President Bush and advised Mitt Romney in his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination.

October 26, 2008

Like most economists, those at the International Monetary Fund are lowering their growth forecasts. The financial turmoil gripping Wall Street will probably spill over onto every other street in America. Most likely, current job losses are only the tip of an ugly iceberg.

But when Olivier Blanchard, the I.M.F.’s chief economist, was asked about the possibility of the world sinking into another Great Depression, he reassuringly replied that the chance was “nearly nil.” He added, “We’ve learned a few things in 80 years.”

Yes, we have. But have we learned what caused the Depression of the 1930s? Most important, have we learned enough to avoid doing the same thing again?…

According to the economic historian CHRISTINA D. ROMER, A PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, the great volatility of stock prices at the time also increased consumers’ feelings of uncertainty, inducing them to put off purchases until the uncertainty was resolved. Spending on consumer durable goods like autos dropped precipitously in 1930….

                          ==========

New Interagency Website: EconomicRecovery.gov

“U.S. Secretary of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez took questions from the public concerning the current U.S. economy and announced a new interagency Web site led by the Commerce Department in an Interactive online forum, “Ask the White House.” The new web site, EconomicRecovery.gov , is a resource for the latest information from government agencies on America’s economic recovery for people to keep their homes, find jobs and protect their savings.”

                          ==========

Radio host Bob Grant repeats discredited email smears on Obama

Radio host Bob Grant falsely attributed several quotes to Sen. Barack Obama and took other Obama quotes out of context. Among the purported “quotes” Grant aired during the program were remarks that actually were penned by conservative writer John Semmens, in a column titled “Semi-News — A Satirical Look at Recent News,” about which FactCheck.org wrote: “The quote was one conservative writer’s idea of a joke, which has been picked up and repeated as though it were true in a chain e-mail.”

Read More

http://mediamatters.org/items/200810270010?lid=713708&rid=16958118

THE GOP-TERRORISM CONNECTION: IT’S NOT ‘JUST’ PALIN

By Paul Rosenberg, Open Left

Conservatives are perfectly willing to embrace terrorism — if it’s the “right” kind of terrorism.

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/104671/

                          ==========

October 2008 Southwest Climate Outlook

Thursday, October 23, 2008

The October Southwest Climate Outlook is online. This month’s feature article is an annual feature entitled, “2008 Water Year in review.” After six years of publication, CLIMAS is reviewing the Southwest Climate Outlook by gathering feedback from its readers. Please help us by taking a short online survey–it should only take about 10 minutes of your time. Your participation is very important, as it will help us make the Outlook better suit your needs and interests. The survey will be available online through the end of October.

To take the survey, please visit:

http://climas.biocom.arizona.edu/login.cfm

A link at the end of the survey will direct you to the October Southwest Climate Outlook.
 

To proceed directly to the Southwest Climate Outlook in html format or view the printer-friendly PDF file visit:

http://www.climas.arizona.edu/forecasts/swsummary.html

Highlights from the October 2008 Outlook

Drought – Summer monsoon thunderstorm activity through late August helped improve short-term drought conditions across much of southern Arizona.

Temperature – The new water year has begun with temperatures 2–4 degrees Fahrenheit cooler than average across all of Arizona and western New Mexico.

Precipitation – The beginning of New Mexico’s water year has been very wet, while Arizona’s has been very dry.

ENSO – ENSO-neutral conditions are once again the dominant pattern across the Pacific basin; the probability continues to increase of ENSO-neutral conditions persisting through this fall and into the winter.

Climate Forecasts – Temperature forecasts call for equal chances of above-, below-, and near-normal temperatures in most of the region west of the Rockies throughout the remainder of 2008 and into early 2009. Precipitation forecasts call for slightly increased chances of below-average precipitation for the same period.

The Bottom Line – New Mexico’s soil moisture is favorable for crops, due in part to recent wet conditions, while dry conditions in Arizona have made soils extremely dry. With respect to water storage, Lakes Powell and Mead declined by 236,000 acre-feet during September 2008. Although the combined levels fell in the last month, they are significantly higher than they were one year ago. Reservoir storage in New Mexico also slightly declined in September.

Kristen E. Nelson
Associate EditorInstitute of Environment and Society
715 N. Park Ave., 2nd Floor
Tucson, AZ 85721

                          ==========

EIA, the Nation’s clearinghouse for energy statistics – Today’s Gasoline Prices

Monday, October 27, 2008

RETAIL GASOLINE: (Self Service Prices per Gallon, Including Taxes) This report contains price estimates for gasoline sold in ozone non-attainment areas which require the sale of reformulated gasoline (RFG) as designated by the Environmental Protection Agency, and Conventional areas which includes both attainment areas and carbon monoxide non-attainment areas.

Mogas web site url

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/fwd/wrgp.html

                          ==========

Bush Thumbs Nose at New Government Accountability Law

President Bush issued a signing statement for a bill that will improve the independence of inspector general (IG) offices within the federal government. Since IG offices monitor efficiency, waste, and fraud in the government, but are also housed within the federal government, Congress saw fit to enact new measures to insulate IG offices from political interference. Bush objects to a part of the bill that attempts to stem that interference.

Read more…

http://ombwatch.org/article/blogs/entry/5452/38

                          ==========

Congressman Paul’s Texas Straight Talk

Monday, October 27, 2008

“With news this week that Congress is poised to consider a new stimulus package, I am forced to again ask a question that seems silly in Washington:  How will we pay for this?

While a few Members of Congress have raised the issue, it certainly was not the primary concern of the House Budget Committee when they interviewed Ben Bernanke on Monday.  And, when they did direct this question to the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, his answer was the standard rhetoric about how Congress needed to make tough choices.  Needless to say, not many specifics were discussed.  One of the most liberal members of the House, Barney Frank, has at least volunteered something of a suggestion: “We can let Iraq take care of itself.”  This, of course, goes in the right direction, but hardly far enough.”

Click here to read the full article:

http://www.house.gov/paul/index.shtml

                          ==========

Borowitz Report – Cancellation Shocker

October 28, 2008

World Series Cancelled for Lack of Interest
Phillies Led, Something to Something
In an unprecedented move, Major League Baseball cancelled the 2008 World Series today, citing “overwhelming lack of interest.”

This year’s contest, featuring the Philadelphia Phillies and some other team, will be the first-ever World Series to be yanked before completion, but in the words of one baseball executive, “We’re fairly sure no one will notice.”

The decision to pull the plug on the Series came last night after the fifth game of the contest was rain-delayed and suspended with the score standing at something to something.

Some guys were on base and another guy was pitching when the rains came, but no one in the stadium showed a flicker of interest in the outcome.

“Enough already,” said baseball commissioner Bud Selig.  “Let’s put this thing out of its misery.”

At Fox Broadcasting, executives were reportedly “deliriously happy” about the cancellation of the low-rated Series and immediately announced plans to replace it with reruns of “Family Guy” and “House.”

In Philadelphia, slugger Ryan Howard was philosophical about the decision to pull the Series: “I wasn’t really following it – who was ahead, anyway?”

Upcoming Events

January 1, 2009 at 12:01AM

Andy’s 2009 Shows
Watch this space for Andy’s performances in 2009.

http://www.borowitzreport.com/
 

                          ==========

three thousand words

Tom Tomorrow: What REAL Americans believe

http://tinyurl.com/69pspx

Jimmy Margulies: great … then you’ll give us a bailout?

http://tinyurl.com/6mxtu6

Clement: we think you should start concentrating on florida

http://img.slate.com/media/48/081027.gif

Tuesday October 28, 2008 – “Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it.” – Henry David Thoreau

Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

Unscrupulous Manipulation of the US Financial Architecture: The Failed Presidency of George W. Bush A Dismal Legacy. Part II

By Prof. Rodrigue Tremblay
Global Research, October 25, 2008

Author’s Website:

www.thenewamericanempire.com/

“Greed is good. Greed is right. Greed Works.”Gordon Gekko, corporate raider (played by Michael Douglas) in the movie Wall St.

“President [George W.] Bush will be remembered as the most fiscally irresponsible president in our nation’s history.” Sen. Kent Conrad, Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee

 

[The government's decision to buy shares in the nation's leading banks] “is not intended to take over the free market, but to preserve it.”President George W. Bush, October 14, 2008

“Our country for the first time in my life time has abandoned the basic principle of human rights. …We’ve said that the Geneva Conventions do not apply to those people in Abu Ghraib prison and Guantanamo, and we’ve said we can torture prisoners and deprive them of an accusation of a crime to which they are accused.” Jimmy Carter, former American president

 

“After [this] war [against Iraq] has ended, the United States will have to rebuild much more than the country of Iraq. We will have to rebuild America’s image around the globe.”Sen. Robert Byrd, (D-W.Va), March 19, 2003

Economically, the Bush-Cheney administration is leaving behind a big financial and economic mess. In fact, this is an administration that has brought misery upon America by its misguided economic policies that have built a mountain of shaky debt and rendered dysfunctional large segments of the American banking industry and large sectors of the U.S. economy, through inappropriate deregulation to enrich greedy special interest characters, wheeler-dealers, corporate con men, professional short-sellers and other scam artists and swindlers. In so doing, it has empowered rich parasitic speculators and turned the financial sector into a giant casino, thus risking the health of the entire economy. 

Indeed, and to complete the picture, the Bush-Cheney administration has emptied the public treasury, debased the U.S. currency and fueled deflation, inflation and, in the end, produced stagflation and what can turn out to be a very serious recession. 

This is understandable. Over the last eight years, the Bush-Cheney administration has adopted a laissez-faire policy based on a let-them-eat-cake ideology. It has pushed for economic deregulation throughout the government, beginning with the de-fanging of the Securities and Exchange Commission. It has pursued an aggressive policy of deregulation of the large global investment banks, which were basically left to self-regulate themselves and allowed to build up the largest mountain of flimsy backed debt instruments and risky financial derivative products ever seen in history. It did the same thing for other regulatory agencies such as the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency, worker safety and transportation agencies. 

It is thus no accident that the Bush-Cheney administration has presided over one of the worst financial collapses and credit crises in U.S. history, by packing regulatory agencies with cronies whose mission it was to let rapacious speculators and market manipulators go wild. The result has been the creation of a casino-like speculative economy that is now crashing down before our very eyes.  

Under Bush-Cheney, financial markets became manipulated by unscrupulous bankers and by rapacious hedge funds, as public regulation was reduced to a minimum. Millions of Americans lost their homes through foreclosure and many more saw their working and pension incomes eroded and destroyed by inflation and plant closings. And as what could be a protracted recession proceeds, many more will lose their jobs in the coming months, while some older employees may have to postpone their retirement because of the disappearance of their pension money. 

In a parody of President Abraham Lincoln, we can say this has been an administration that deserved to be dubbed “a government of the wealthy, by the wealthy and for the wealthy.” Some would not hesitate to say, also in parody, that it has been “a government of Goldman Sachs, by Goldman Sachs and for Goldman Sachs,” considering the ubiquitous political and economic role which that firm has played within the Bush-Cheney administration. President Bush’s own Chief of Staff, Mr. Joshua Bolten, comes from Goldman Sachs. And these days, everybody pretends not see the real and potential conflicts of interests of other public servants who are now on the giving public side of things, at the U.S. Treasury, and who are going to be on the receiving private side of public money, in a scant few months. It is the same thing with a lot of what the U.S. Treasury does. —Even the Governor of the Bank of Canada, Mr. Mark Carney, is a former employee of Goldman Sachs!

In a related matter, for historical purposes, it will be remembered that, in the fall of 2008, the Bush-Cheney administration sponsored a huge rescue-plus-bailout of the largest speculative Wall Street investment banks (which the Bush SEC had deregulated on March 28, 2004) and of a host of other banking and insurance institutions which had engaged in alchemy or synthetic finance and made risky investments. To that effect, it is ready to place at risk close to $2.0 trillion of public money and let the public debt explode, with few conditions attached to protect the public interest. In fact, the Bush administration stood ready to advance hundreds of billions of dollars and only requested non-voting preferred shares in the troubled banks and insurance companies that it rescued from bankruptcy. As a consequence, contrary to what the Roosevelt administration did in the 1930s, the U.S. government has no direct say about the way the troubled financial institutions are managed and run, and thus, if the bail-out were to be successful, most of the benefits would go to bank owners and their executives; but, if things continue to deteriorate, taxpayers will be the ones left holding the bag.  

Some have said this is an example of corporate socialism for the rich. In  fact, this has nothing to do with socialism per se, but everything to do with legal and unapologetical extortionism on a high level. For all these reasons, if the ongoing recession and financial crisis were to turn into a full-fledged economic depression, as it could possibly do, and as it did in 1873-1880 and 1929-1939, it would have to be dubbed by historians “the Bush-Cheney Grand Economic Depression” of 2008-20(?). 

George W. Bush will also be remembered for having financed his whimsical and ill-conceived three-trillion-dollar war of aggression against Iraq on credit, thus worsening the U.S. financial situation in the world, perhaps irrevocably. He is leaving behind him a financial mess like no one has seen since the great depressions following 1873 and 1929.

In all fairness, it must be said that some Democrats in Congress, the so-called Bush Democrats who usually vote with Republicans on foreign policy issues, have also been supporters of the Iraq War from the beginning and have invariably voted for the hundreds of billions of dollars required to finance it. 

The Bush-Cheney administration has presided over economic dislocations and greed-fed financial bubbles, and it has been an agent of poverty and of financial and economic crises. This is an administration that will be sadly remembered for its huge tax cuts for the super rich, for its huge fiscal deficits bequeathed to future generations and for its huge and costly bailouts for speculators and high flyers, and very little for families and ordinary citizens.  

As a consequence, on the whole, Americans are today poorer than when this duo took power eight years ago, while the gap between the very rich and the average American has never been wider. It has been a regime that has borrowed and borrowed, debased the currency, waged unnecessary wars and doled out defense contracts in the most reckless possible way, with a minimum of oversight and accountability.

International Mess: An Irresponsible Attempt to rekindle the Cold War

Internationally, Bush and Cheney not only started a war against Iraq, a country that had never attacked the United States, but they also did their utmost to recklessly restart the Cold War with Russia. They did that by unilaterally abrogating the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, by transforming NATO into an offensive military alliance and  by installing anti-missile sites, manned by American soldiers, in former Warsaw Pact countries, such as Poland and the Czech Republic, and in former Soviet republics, right next to Russia’s borders.

The Bush-Cheney administration designed a policy of encircling Russia by arming pro-U.S. European client states. That is why they have directly provoked Russia by incorporating six former Warsaw Pact nations and three former soviet republics in the now offensive and U.S.-controlled military alliance that is NATO. They went as far as to openly support and arm aggression-prone governments in some former Soviet republics, especially in Georgia, the birthplace of Stalin. All this reflects a pro-active and aggressive military stance against Russia designed to provoke Russia and restart the Cold War, thus dangerously increasing the chances of a nuclear world war.

Let us recall that when Khrushchev’s Soviet Union tried to install missiles in Cuba in 1962, it nearly started a world war. Now, half a century later, with Bush-Cheney, the brinkmanship is on the other side. They have acted irresponsibly in provoking Russia, as if they did not mind restarting a cold war with that country. Russian exasperation was well expressed by then Russian President Vladimir Putin when, in 2007, he said that “The United States [under Bush and Cheney] has overstepped its national borders in every way, and as a result, no one feels safe. . . . such a policy stimulates an arms race.”
 

Disrespect of Military Advice

Complete article at:

www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10684

Rodrigue Tremblay is professor emeritus of economics at the University of Montreal and can be reached at: rodrigue.tremblay@ yahoo.com.

He is the author of the book ‘The New American Empire’.

Visit his blog site at

www.thenewamericanempire.com/blog.

Author’s Website:

www.thenewamericanempire.com/

Check Dr. Tremblay’s coming book “The Code for Global Ethics” at:

www.TheCodeForGlobalEthics.com/

‘You’ll have a revolution on your hands.’ –Sen. Chris Dodd, D-CT: So When Will Banks Give Loans?

By Joe Nocera

25 Oct 2008

It is starting to appear as if one of Treasury’s key rationales for the recapitalization program — namely, that it will cause banks to start lending again — is a fig leaf, Treasury’s version of the weapons of mass destruction. In fact, Treasury wants banks to acquire each other and is using its power to inject capital to force a new and wrenching round of bank consolidation… Mr. [Mark] Landler’s story noted that Treasury would even funnel some of the bailout money to help banks buy other banks. And, in an almost unnoticed move, it recently put in place a new tax break, worth billions to the banking industry, that has only one purpose: to encourage bank mergers… Late Thursday afternoon, I caught up with Senator Dodd, and asked him what he was going to do if the loan situation didn’t improve: “If it turns out that they are hoarding, you’ll have a revolution on your hands. People will be so livid and furious that their tax money is going to line their pockets instead of doing the right thing. There will be hell to pay.”

At:

http://tinyurl.com/5tw2ho (www.nytimes.com)

From: CLG News

                          ==========

Taxpayers for Common Sense: Deficits Do Matter

Deficits Do Matter

Volume XIII No. 43 – October 24, 2008

This week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke observed that it is “appropriate” to consider a “significant” stimulus. Of course, the Chairman’s comments that Congress “limit longer-term effects on the federal government’s structural budget deficit” didn’t get the same amount of attention.

Politicians of all stripes have recently been embracing the economic views of John Maynard Keynes, proclaiming that with today’s sizable economic challenges, broad government spending is the right way to jumpstart the economy. Budget discipline, many argue, has to be temporarily pushed to the side in favor of deficit spending on infrastructure, jobs programs, and other investments.

Unfortunately, pushing budget discipline to the side is nothing new to policymakers, and in recent years, deficit spending has been the norm. In 2002, Vice President Cheney told then-Secretary of the Treasury Paul O’Neill that “Deficits don’t matter.” Since that time, lawmakers and the administration have led the country into an ocean of red ink. Revenue cuts and massive spending increases became a recipe for record deficits.

Over the past seven years, we’ve added $4.2 trillion to our debt, bringing it to a whopping $10 trillion. In FY 2008, we paid more than $450 billion in interest alone. As the debt increases, so will our interest payments. Even without stimulus spending, our deficit spending would continue without a major change in course.

And as Dr. Robert F. Wescott, President of Keybridge Research, recently told Congress, “There can be a point where budget deficits are so large that they cause private investors to lose confidence in the country’s fiscal management.” That would be the tipping point; if investors lose confidence then the U.S. government is going to have to pay higher interest rates to get people to buy our debt.

So when Congress and the next President consider new major spending, it is more important than ever that they keep in mind that deficits do matter. Whatever stimulus is enacted needs to be targeted and effective, and not simply a regurgitation of political favorites regardless of whether they are appropriate fixes to the current problems.

Congress is talking about everything from extending unemployment insurance and expanding food stamps benefits to a temporary capital gains tax cut. There’s also talk about plowing money into infrastructure to generate jobs and providing aid to states in the red. Some of these provisions may be helpful, but only if considered in the context of the specific needs of the current crisis. It is time for Congress to put partisanship aside in favor of hard-nosed, tough decisions that benefit the country.

The argument for deficit spending in times of recession isn’t new. Unfortunately, years of deficit spending have given us no fiscal slack to deal with these tough times. Because we re-elected the Republicans and Democrats that led us over this fiscal cliff, politicians have concluded that concerns over the deficit take a back seat to other voter priorities. But deficits do matter, and we hope voters, Congress, and the next President don’t forget that.
 

Let us know what you think.

Going on at Taxpayer.net This Week

Fundraising Totals for Party Conventions

50% of Bailout Package Spent

President Approves $5 Billion in Defense Earmarks

FY2009 Appropriations Bills: TCS Analyses and Earmark Databases

Blogging the Senator Stevens Trial

Stevens Trial: Jury Dismissed for Weekend, Return Unknown
Pub Date: Oct 24, 2008

Stevens Trial: Jury Instructions
Pub Date: Oct 23, 2008

Stevens Trial: It’s the Jury’s Turn
Pub Date: Oct 22, 2008

Stevens Trial: Closing Arguments
Pub Date: Oct 21, 2008

Stevens Trial: Closing Arguments Tomorrow
Pub Date: Oct 20, 2008

Stevens Trial: Senator Continues Testimony
Pub Date: Oct 20, 2008

TCS in the News

TCS was cited in dozens of stories this past week Check them all out in the Headlines About TCS section of our redesigned website.

Notable Quote

“I am looking out there at three Bill Buckners. All of you let the ball go through your legs.”

–Rep. John Yarmuth (D-KY), referring to Alan Greenspan, John Snow, and Christopher Cox on October 23, 2008.

weekly wastebasket at www.taxpayer.net

                          ==========

Post Only Supports Bailout for Robert Rubin, Not Autoworkers 

We all know how hard it is to get by on tens of millions of dollars a year. That is why the Washington Post was near hysterical in its support of the Wall Street bailout earlier this month. They argued that if we didn’t give $700 billion to the banks right away that all hell would break loose.

Those who wanted to put conditions that ensured that the money didn’t go into the pockets of shareholders or top executives, or even that the bailout was done the right way through direct injections of capital (as it eventually was) were denounced as reactionary Neanderthals. So, the bailout went through and the Wall Street executives are now getting tens of millions in compensation, courtesy of average taxpayers.

Now the occasion comes to bailout the auto industry and the Post goes ballistic the other way. After all, the average autoworker makes $56,650 a year. That’s almost as much as Robert Rubin makes in a day. Who do these autoworkers think they are?

There are serious issues that should be asked about any bailout of Detroit, but it is a bit obscene to see a paper that in both its editorial and news pages was an active supporter of handing tens of billions of dollars to rich Wall Street bankers suddenly turn around and get hysterical about the idea of helping workers making $57,000 a year. And remember, none of these autoworkers are responsible for wrecking the economy.

Dean Baker, CEPR

Beat the Press’ Weekly Roundup

http://prospect.org/csnc/blogs/beat_the_press

                          ==========

Committee Holds Hearing on the Credit Rating Agencies and the Financial Crisis

“The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee held a hearing titled, Credit Rating Agencies and the Financial Crisis on Wednesday, October 22, 2008…The hearing examined the actions of the three largest credit rating agencies, Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Corporation, and Fitch Ratings, leading up to the current financial crisis.”

http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=2250

                          ==========

MICHAEL MOORE: NO MORE SOCIALISM FOR THE RICH!

CNN

“McCain is going to make sure the wealthy get another incredible tax break while everybody else suffers.”

http://www.alternet.org/election08/104721/

                          ==========

Committee Holds Hearing on the the Role of Federal Regulators in the Financial Crisis

“The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held holding a hearing titled, The Financial Crisis and the Role of Federal Regulators on, Thursday, October 23, 2008. The hearing examined the roles and responsibilities of federal regulators in the current financial crisis. A preliminary hearing transcript (201 pages, PDF) is available for download.”

http://tinyurl.com/6m8o7a  (oversight.house.gov)

                          ==========

“Employment in the New York–New Jersey Region: 2008 Review and Outlook,”

by Jason Bram, James Orr, and Rae Rosen

The 2007 slowing in job growth in the New York–New Jersey region continued through August 2008. A projected weakening in the national economy through the end of 2008 combined with the market turmoil affecting New York City’s finance sector suggests that the region will post substantially smaller job gains this year than it did in 2007. Beyond 2008, continued financial stress could lead to an even sharper and more protracted contraction in the city’s finance sector, potentially spreading to other sectors of the region’s economy.

Read the full article:

http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues/ci14-7.html

                          ==========

Automotive plant closing, over 550 losing jobs … and more

Chicago Tribune – United States

Johnson Controls Inc. announced it will be closing its automotive interiors manufacturing plant in Cadiz that employs 559 workers as part of a global

http://tinyurl.com/6pp4gl (www.chicagotribune.com)

Dell is mum about possible plant sale

Winston-Salem Journal – Winston-Salem,NC,USA

Dell is closing a desktop-computer plant in Austin, Texas, cutting 900 jobs. “One person briefed on the plan said he expects the company to sell most — and …

http://tinyurl.com/5howvk (www2.journalnow.com)

Panasonic to close stereo plant in Peachtree City

WTVM – Columbus,GA,USA

(AP) – Panasonic is closing its car stereo manufacturing plant by the end of next year, meaning that 500 people will lose their jobs. The plant closing is 1 …

http://tinyurl.com/5kusa4 (www.wtvm.com)

Local workers recall East Huntingdon plant closing – Tribune-Review

Aug 24, 2008

… Former Volkswagen Westmoreland workers remain bitter and angry over the German company’s decision to tell workers during Thanksgiving week …

http://tinyurl.com/5eqeas (www.pittsburghlive.com)

Oddi Atlantic plant closing its doors

Bethany Beach Wave – Bethany Beach,DE,USA

By Deborah Gates • Staff Writer • September 27, 2008

PRINCESS ANNE — Employees drifted in and out of the Oddi Atlantic plant Friday as numbed
and shocked …

http://tinyurl.com/42vck4 (www.delmarvanow.com)

Tower Automotive closing TC plant

Traverse City Record Eagle – Traverse City,MI,USA

Tower announced the closing Friday morning, blaming the shutdown on “reduced automotive industry demand in North America” according to a statement issued by …

http://tinyurl.com/4u2pwc (www.record-eagle.com)

Central Pa. medical products company to close

Lebanon Daily News – Lebanon,PA,USA

Medical devices manufacturer Avail Medical Products is closing its plant in central Pennsylvania by the end of the year, a company official said. …

http://www.ldnews.com/news/ci_10637968

Closing will idle plant in Carlisle

The Patriot-News – PennLive.com – Harrisburg,PA,USA

Officials of International Automotive Components North America told 152 workers on Wednesday that the Carlisle plant will close on Dec. 12. …

http://tinyurl.com/4xhg2u (www.pennlive.com)

Brunswick Corp. closing boatyard at Wilmington, cutting 270 jobs

New Bern Sun Journal – New Bern,NC,USA

This (closing) plant make smaller, fiberglass boats … and the market is hard on them right now. The New Bern plant has done a nice job of keeping its …

http://tinyurl.com/47cypk (www.newbernsj.com)

Janesville’s GM Plant Could Close Sooner Than Expected

The future of Janesville’s GM plant is looking grim. after recent rumors the plant could be closing sooner then expected.

http://www.wifr.com/news/headlines/30850724.html

Plant Closing Down In Troy – News Story – WHIO Dayton

Oct 10, 2008 … TROY, Ohio — Around 140 workers found out Friday that their plant will close down in Miami County. Friday, October 10, 2008.

http://www.whiotv.com/news/17689318/detail.html

Holly Hill plant closing, taking 100-plus jobs

The Times and Democrat – Orangeburg,SC,USA

By GENE ZALESKI, T&D Staff Writer

Sunday, October 19, 2008 Roseburg Forest

Products is closing its medium-density fiberboard manufacturing facility in Holly …

http://tinyurl.com/6sazov (www.thetandd.com)

Poultry plant’s closing to cost 600 jobs

Atlanta Journal Constitution – GA, USA

The plant is not a slaughter facility. The closing is among the largest plant shutdowns announced in Georgia in the past two years, according to notices …

http://tinyurl.com/6eqmop (www.ajc.com)

159 will lose jobs in Lake Mills plant closing

Wisconsin State Journal – Madison,WI,USA

The SPX Corp. filed notice with the state that it will close its APV North America plant on Dec. 31, eliminating 159 jobs from the western Jefferson County …

http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/biz/310059

Plant closing puts 25 percent of Elm City’s workforce out of a job

WRAL.com – Raleigh,NC,USA

Sanders says he and his 379 co-workers learned about the plant’s closing during a morning staff meeting. “I think they were surprised. …

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/3807590/

Northwest Ohio auto parts plant closing

WDTN – Dayton,OH,USA

… owned by Sypris Solutions of Louisville, Ky., makes axles for tractor-trailers. Officials say three years of losses for the plant led up to the closing.

http://tinyurl.com/5whduc (www.wdtn.com)

                          ==========

Borowitz Report – Obama Ad Shocker

October 26, 2008

Glitch Knocks Obama’s Ads Off Air for Thirty Seconds

Half-minute Hiatus Causes Alarm in Campaign
 

Obama campaign officials today were trying to get to the bottom of a technical glitch that knocked the Democratic presidential nominee’s television ads off the air for thirty seconds yesterday.

Mr. Obama’s ads, which have been playing on a continuous loop for the past seven weeks, were scheduled to be broadcast without interruption until Election Day – and so the half-minute hiatus on Saturday set off alarm bells within the Illinois senator’s campaign.

“I was watching a football game and they went to commercial,” said Obama campaign manager David Axelrod.  “And I was expecting to see one of Barack’s ads, but instead it was a car commercial.  I totally freaked.”

Mr. Axelrod said that he and top campaign ads have spent the better part of the day trying to figure out what went wrong “and to make sure it doesn’t happen again.”

“Our strategy of airing Obama ads nonstop around the clock has really started to pay off,” he said.  “Our polling shows that people are starting to see these ads in their sleep.”

Despite national polls showing Mr. Obama in the lead, Mr. Axelrod warned against overconfidence: “There’s always a chance of an ‘October Surprise’ – some kind of unexpected external crisis created by Joe Biden.”

Upcoming Events
January 1, 2009 at 12:01AM

Andy’s 2009 Shows
Watch this space for Andy’s performances in 2009.

http://www.borowitzreport.com/

                          ==========

three thousand words

Ben Sargent: The Other America

http://tinyurl.com/69rl86

Ted Rall: humans against people

http://tinyurl.com/6fhzky

Monte Wolverton: palin’s pipeline plot

http://tinyurl.com/6orrur

Monday October 27, 2008 – Freedom is nothing else other than a chance to be better. – Albert Camus

Monday, October 27th, 2008

Greenspan Expert

Friday, October 24, 2008

The lead piece in the Washington Post today is “Greenspan Says he was Wrong on Regulation.” (The piece is critiqued by economist Dean Baker, who continuously warned of the ramifications of the housing bubble since early in this decade:

<http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/beat_the_press_archive?month=10&year=2008&base_name=citing_the_biggest_losers_post>).

ROBERT AUERBACH, auerbach@mail.utexas.edu,

http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/faculty/auerbach.html

Professor of public affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, Auerbach wrote the new book “Deception and Abuse at the Fed: Henry B. Gonzalez Battles Alan Greenspan’s Bank.” Auerbach was an economist with the House Committee on Financial Services including during a period when Texas Congressman Gonzalez attempted to achieve a level of meaningful oversight over the Fed. Gonzalez was continuously thwarted by Greenspan.

Auerbach said today: “Yesterday, Alan Greenspan’s testimony contained the same type of dodges that the master of garblements had displayed in the 1990s when he achieved saint-like status as leader of the Federal Reserve. Greenspan’s response to questions about the causes of the current economic crisis included the unreliability of predictions and the failure to regulate one particular financial derivative. That narrowing of causes hides his dismal record on regulation.

“Greenspan had already been through a financial crisis and should have known exactly why better regulation was needed. Greenspan fought House Financial Services Chairman Henry B. Gonzalez, who pushed for needed regulation that was plainly illustrated after the savings and loan/banking crisis that ended in the early 1990s.

“The Clinton administration called for a rational bank regulatory system by consolidating the bank regulators into one agency. Greenspan railed against the idea and talked about the need for ‘hands-on
regulation’ by the Fed. Gonzalez replied that Greenspan failed to tell us where the Fed really has its hands and that the only hands that should be on Federal Bank regulation are those of a neutral bank regulator. Since two-thirds of the nine directors at each of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks are elected by the banks in their district, there are profound conflicts of interest with bankers regulating themselves.

“In his 2007 book, ‘The Age of Turbulence,’ Greenspan changed his mind and said that ‘hands-on supervision and regulation’ is ‘being swamped.’ That was last year when he wrote ‘We have no sensible choice other than to let markets work.’ Yesterday he testified he was wrong about his hands-off regulatory philosophy. The 2007 hands-off regulatory philosophy was a change from his previous hands-on regulatory stance. This is not philosophy. It is the ‘master of garblements,’ the title of Chapter 3 in my book ‘Deception and Abuse at the Fed: Henry B. Gonzalez Battles Alan Greenspan’s Bank.’”

From: Institute for Public Accuracy

                          ==========

Op-Ed: The New Fear

It’s not just about 9/11

Chronicle of Higher Education (*requires registration)

http://tinyurl.com/6gk3gg (chronicle.com)

By Sasha Abramsky

Sasha Abramsky is a journalist and lecturer in the writing program at the University of California at Davis. His latest book is American Furies: Crime, Punishment, and Vengeance in the Age of Mass Imprisonment (Beacon Press, 2007). He is at work on a book about hunger in America, Breadline USA, to be published by PoliPointPress in the spring.

October 24, 2008

Increasingly, the policy choices and culture of the West, and of the United States in particular, are being shaped by something approaching a collective siege mentality. We fear immigrants and the terrorist ideologies they may or may not bring with them; we fear diseases, despite being the healthiest Americans in history; we fear crime and drugs and sexual decadence; we fear cultural collapse. Right now, above all we fear economic failure.

When oil prices soar, we worry about an end to our commuter lifestyles. When stock prices gyrate, we worry about what happens when we buy or sell at the wrong time. Will we be able to send our kids to college, be able to retire as planned? When subprime mortgages aren’t paid back, and banks are hoarding cash, should investors pull out of money-market funds? Some of those fears make perfect sense; but some are evidence that stampedes on banks, stocks, and other companies can create new stampedes, and that fear and rationality aren’t always happy bedfellows.

…THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY LEGAL SCHOLAR JONATHAN S. SIMON describes, in Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear (Oxford, 2007), the emergence of a political elite that relies on stoking public fears of crime and criminals as a fundamental prop ensuring its hold on power. He writes about politicians who play up to crime-victims groups and, in so doing, wrap a mantle of moral inviolability around their own decisions; of how pork-barrel spending figures into that; of a new post-New Deal order in which social relations are mediated through fear and souped-up institutions of coercion….

                          ==========

CFTC.gov Commitments of Traders Reports Update

Friday, October 24, 2008

The current reports for the week of October  24, 2008 are now available.

http://tinyurl.com/3ymzao

Penalty for Defrauding Investors in a “Ponzi” Scheme: Jinsup Choi

CFTC Press Release 5568-08 provides further details on this action.

http://tinyurl.com/5rkx6j

37 criminal counts in connection with the operation of an illegal commodity pool: Ted James Johnson

CFTC Press Release 5567-08 provides further details on this action.

http://tinyurl.com/6s348s

                          ==========

Foreign companies’ U.S. subsidiaries competing for bailout billions

25 Oct 2008

Insurers, automakers and American subsidiaries of foreign banks all want the Treasury Department to cut them a piece of the largest government rescue in U.S. history. The Financial Services Roundtable wrote Treasury officials on Friday requesting that the initiative to buy $250 billion in bank stock grow to cover insurers, auto companies, securities dealers and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign companies, including banks. [This 'socialism,' aka welfare for Bush's corpora-terrorist cronies, is *outrageous.*]

At:

http://tinyurl.com/67g42a

From: CLG News

                          ==========

They Did It On Purpose: The Housing Bubble & Its Crash were Engineered by the US Government, the Fed & Wall Street

By Richard C. Cook
 

Global Research, October 23, 2008

During the Clinton administration, the government required the financial industry to start expanding the frequency of mortgage loans to consumers who might not have qualified in the past.

When George W. Bush was named president by the Supreme Court in December 2000, the stock market had begun to decline with the bursting of the dot.com bubble.

In 2001 the frequency of White House visits by Alan Greenspan increased.

Greenspan endorsed President Bush’s March 2001 tax cuts for the rich. More such cuts took place in May 2003.

Signs of recession had begun to show in early 2001. The stock market crashed after 9/11. The U.S. invaded Afghanistan in October 2001 and Iraq in March 2003.

The Federal Reserve began cutting interest rates, and by 2002 a home-buying frenzy was underway. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac went along by guaranteeing the increasing number of mortgage loans.

According to a mortgage broker this writer interviewed, word began to come down through the mortgage banks to begin falsifying mortgage applications to show more borrower income than borrowers actually possessed

Banks that wrote mortgages began to offload them when Wall Street packaged them into mortgage-backed securities that were sold around the world as bonds to investors.

Risk-analysts at the leading credit-rating agencies, such as Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch, gave their highest ratings to mortgage-backed securities whose risks were later acknowledged to be grossly underestimated.

Mortgage companies, with Alan Greenspan’s endorsement, began to offer more Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs), loans that would reset at much higher rates in future years.

Mortgage brokers fed the growing bubble by telling people they should buy now because housing prices would keep going up and they could resell at a profit before their ARMs escalated.

Huge amounts of money began to flow into the economy from mortgages and home equity loans and from capital gains on resale of inflating property.

Meanwhile, in the world of investment securities, the Securities and Exchange Commission greatly reduced the amount of their own capital investors were required to bring to the table, resulting in a huge increase in bank leveraging of speculative trading.

George W. Bush was reelected in 2004 at the height of the housing and investment bubbles. By 2005 the housing bubble was accounting for half of all U.S. economic growth and yielding huge tax revenues to all levels of government.

Despite the tax revenues from the bubbles the Bush administration was running huge budget deficits from expenditures on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq .

ABC News reports that during this time risk analysts at Washington Mutual, one of the nation’s largest banks, were told to ignore high risk loans because lending had to be maximized. Those who objected were disciplined or fired.

State attorneys-general moved to investigate mortgage fraud but were blocked from doing so by orders of the Treasury Department’s Comptroller of the Currency. There was no federal agency that was charged with regulating mortgage fraud.

In February 2006, Ben Bernanke replaced Alan Greenspan as Federal Reserve Chairman and held interest rates steady. Homeowners began to default as ARMs reset.

The housing bubble began to collapse in 2006-2007, with the economy showing early signs of a recession and the stock market starting to decline by August 2007. Home prices began to plummet in most markets, with millions of homeowners owing more on their homes than their new appraisals.

Homeowners began to default, with over four million homes going to foreclosure from 2006-2008. In many cases, homeowners simply walked away, dropping off the keys to their houses at the bank.

The U.S. economy shed 60,000 jobs in August 2008. In a year, Wall Street had cut 200,000 jobs. State and local governments began to cut budgets and jobs.

The “toxic debt” from the collapse of the housing bubble brought about a full-scale crash of the U.S. financial system by September 2008. The stock market immediately fell, with 40 percent of its value—$8 trillion—now having been lost in a year. $2 trillion of the losses were in retirement savings.

The crash of the U.S. economy began to reverberate around the world with bankers and the IMF warning of an onrushing global recession.

Massive bailouts by the U.S. Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve failed to stem the tide of the crashing markets. By late October 2008 the recession has begun to hit in force.

As the situation worsened, big banks like J.P. Morgan Chase received government capitalization even as they were buying up banks that were failing. J.P. Morgan Chase paid $1.9 billion for Washington Mutual with assets of over $300 billion.

The U.S. government joined with the nations of Europe in planning a series of economic summits to explore global financial solutions. President Bush will host the first summit in Washington , D.C. , on November 15, after the U.S. presidential election.

The U.S. military shifted combat troops from Iraq to the U.S. to contain possible civil unrest.

Most major retail chains began to close stores and lay off employees even as the Christmas season approached.

The Washington Post reported on October 23, 2008: “Employers are moving to aggressively cut jobs and reduce costs in the fact of the nation’s economic crisis, preparing for what many fear will be a long and painful recession.”

URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10654

Richard C. Cook is a former U.S. federal government analyst, whose career included service with the U.S. Civil Service Commission, the Food and Drug Administration, the Carter White House, NASA, and the U.S. Treasury Department. His articles on economics, politics, and space policy have appeared in numerous websites and print magazines. His book on monetary reform, entitled We Hold These Truths: The Hope of Monetary Reform, will soon be published by Tendril Press. He is the author of Challenger Revealed: An Insider’s Account of How the Reagan Administration Caused the Greatest Tragedy of the Space Age, called by one reviewer, “the most important spaceflight book of the last twenty years.” His website is www.richardccook.com.

Comments or requests to be added to his mailing list may be sent to EconomicSanity@gmail.com.

Also see a series of his speeches on YouTube at

http://www.youtube.com/user/GracchusJones .

                          ==========

Credit Rating Exec: “We Sold Our Souls to the Devil”

 

Washington Dispatch: Internal documents show that while rating firms publicly defended their practices, executives privately wondered when the house of cards would fall.

By Nick Baumann

October 22, 2008

For years, credit rating agencies—the referees of Wall Street—insisted they were an impartial source of information, despite their financial reliance on the companies they rated. Then came the market meltdown—and a chorus of accusations that firms had artificially inflated their risk ratings to please their clients and gain a competitive edge. And now there’s plenty of evidence to suggest the “referees” were unduly influenced by the players.

According to internal documents released at a congressional hearing Tuesday, while rating agencies strenuously defended their independence publicly, some of their top executives acknowledged privately that they faced fundamental conflicts. As one executive at Moody’s, a major credit rating agency, put it following an internal discussion on the implosion of the subprime mortgage market, “These errors make us look either incompetent at credit analysis, or like we sold our soul to the devil for revenue.” The documents lend credibility to charges by Wall Street executives that the rating agencies deserve part of the blame for the current financial crisis. “The story of the credit rating agencies is a story of colossal failure,” said Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which is holding a series of hearings to investigate the causes of the market meltdown. (Mother Jones also covered hearings on Lehman Brothers and AIG.)

The central problem that confronted the rating agencies, according to witness testimony and internal documents, was a fundamental conflict of interest, one that is inherent to the business model that many agencies adopted in the 1970s. At the time, they moved from charging investors for ratings information to charging companies to rate their products. Since issuers, not investors, are now the major profit center for the “big three” rating firms (Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s), the rating firms have an incentive to deliver good ratings for the issuers, whether or not the financial products in question actually deserve them.

Complete article at:

http://tinyurl.com/5hq77f (www.motherjones.com)

                          ==========

Library of Congress Daily Digest Bulletin – Two New Constitutional Law Articles on War Powers

Saturday October 25, 2008

Two New Constitutional Law Articles on War Powers

The Law Library of Congress is proud to present two new constitutional law articles focusing on war powers. Both articles are available in their entirety in PDF on our U.S. Constitutional Law web page, which includes one book, seventeen articles, and three statements to Congress.

“Presidential Power in National Security: A Guide to the President-Elect,” by Louis Fisher, included among papers prepared for the White House Transition Project, 2008. Over the last half century. Presidents have read their national security powers in sweeping terms, doing great damage to themselves, their parties, the nation, and regions around the world. The effective use of military force and foreign policy initiatives require the building of consensus, public understanding, and acting within the law. Too often, Presidents have claimed the unilateral power to commit the nation to war by making uninformed references to the Commander in Chief Clause. Heavy political and constitutional costs flow from the failure to adhere to the rule of law, checks and balances, and the system of separation of powers.

Louis Fisher, “Lost Constitutional Moorings: Recovering the War Power,” 81 Ind. L. Rev. 1199 (2006). For the past half century. Presidents have claimed constitutional authority to take the country from a state of peace to a state of war against another nation. That was precisely the power that the Framers denied to the President and vested exclusively in Congress. That allocation of power was understood by all three branches until President Harry Truman went to war against North Korea in 1950. He never came to Congress for authority before he acted or any time thereafter. The persistence of unilateral presidential wars does severe damage to the U.S. constitutional system, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the principle of self-government.

http://tinyurl.com/5vuofh (www.loc.gov)

                          ==========

National Security Archive Update, October 24, 2008 – More Cold War Espionage Transcripts Unsealed

Victory for Archive and Historical Associations Results in the Release of New Information About Rosenbergs Spy Case

For more information contact:
Tom Blanton/Meredith Fuchs – 202/994-7000
David Vladeck – 202/662-9540

http://www.nsarchive.org

Washington, DC, October 24, 2008 – Today, in response to a petition filed by the National Security Archive and several historical associations, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) released the previously secret grand jury transcripts of eight witnesses related to Cold War espionage prosecutions. The nearly 300 pages of transcripts from the Brothman/Moskowitz grand jury reveal important new details about the testimony of Elizabeth Bentley, the so-called “Red Spy Queen,” and Harry Gold, who led authorities to David Greenglass and the Rosenbergs. In addition, NARA released the testimonies of Vivian Glassman, Edith Levitov, and Frank Wilentz from the Rosenberg grand jury.

“The release of these additional grand jury records marks an important victory for historians, archivists, and the American people,” stated Meredith Fuchs, the National Security Archive’s General Counsel. “It adds to the historical record on the most important espionage trial in American history, which was a defining moment of the Cold War, and helps us better understand how our society responded to the threat of Soviet espionage.”

The government, through the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, had opposed the release of the Brothman/Moskowitz materials. On August 26, 2008, however, Judge Alvin Hellerstein decided they were of “substantial historical importance” and ordered them released. The government declined to appeal that ruling.

“The disclosure of the Rosenberg and Brothman/Moskowitz transcripts bears witness to the idea that historically valuable grand jury records should, after a reasonable period of time, be made public,” explained David Vladeck, counsel for the Archive and the historical associations that supported the petition and a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center. “Keeping our nation’s history secret serves no legitimate purpose. These records were too important to be left to gather dust on the shelves of the National Archives. Now that they have been released, historians and the American people can come to grips with their own history.”

Visit the Web site of the National Security Archive for more information about today’s posting.

http://www.nsarchive.org

                          ==========

And now for the important news …. 

By Argus Hamilton

Al-Qaeda was reported Monday to have netted eight hundred million dollars cash in illegal drug sales last year. Now they’re all too rich to volunteer for suicide missions. Who would have guessed that the best way to fight terrorism is to do heroin.

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com

                          ==========

three thousand words

Tom Toles: well the bubble burst. …

http://tinyurl.com/5ktbcw

Jack Ohman: gop marxists

http://tinyurl.com/5mpnmc

Bruce Beattie: turns out I don’t walk on water

http://tinyurl.com/59ljup

Sunday October 26, 2008 – When someone has been given much, much will be required in return. – LUKE 12:48

Sunday, October 26th, 2008

PALIN TELLS DOBSON THAT ‘PRAYER WARRIORS’ SHOULD ASK GOD TO INTERVENE IN U.S. ELECTION FOR GOP

By Blue Texan, Firedoglake

Does this mean that Sarah Palin believes that without God’s intervention the McCain-Palin ticket will lose?

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/104166/

                          ==========

PALIN: ‘I DON’T KNOW’ IF ABORTION CLINIC BOMBERS ARE TERRORISTS

By Jed L, Daily Kos

Palin gives a wink and a nod to right-wing extremists, with whom she shares radical views about the reproductive rights of women.

http://www.alternet.org/election08/104590/

                          ==========

Letter from 2012 in Obama’s America

What will the United States be like if Senator Obama is elected? The most reliable way of predicting people’s future actions is by looking at their past actions. Jesus himself taught, “You will recognize them by their fruits” (Matthew 7:16). Anyone who has hired employees knows that – the best predictor of a person’s future job performance is not
what he tells you he can do but what he has actually done in the past.

So here is a picture of the changes that are likely or at least very possible if Senator Obama is elected and the far-left segments of the Democratic Party gain control of the White House, the Congress, and perhaps then the Supreme Court. The entire letter is written as a “What if?” exercise, but that does not make it empty speculation because every future “event” described here is based on established legal and political trends that can already be abundantly documented and that only need a “tipping point” such as the election of Senator Obama and a Democratic House and Senate to begin to put them into place. Every past event named in this letter (everything prior to October 22, 2008) is established fact and has already taken place.

This letter is not “predicting” that all of the imaginative future “events” named in this letter will happen. But it is saying that each one of these changes could happen and also that each change would be a the natural outcome of (a) published legal opinions already written by liberal judges, (b) trends already seen in states with liberal-dominated courts such as California and Massachusetts, (c) recent past promises, practices, and legislative initiatives of the current liberal leadership of the Democratic Party and (d) Senator Obama’s previous actions, previous voting record, and previous public promises to the far-left groups that won the nomination for him.

Many of these changes, if they occur, will have significant implications for Christians. This letter is addressed particularly to their concerns so they will be aware of what is at stake before the November 4 election.

Complete article at:

http://focusfamaction.edgeboss.net/download/focusfamaction/pdfs/10-22-08_2012letter.pdf

                          ==========

AU Press Release :: Houses Of Worship Advised To Refrain From Partisan Politics

October 21, 2008

Americans United Advises Houses Of Worship To Refrain From Intervening In Partisan Politics

Church-State Watchdog Group Sends 100,000 Letters To Religious Leaders Nationwide

Americans United for Separation of Church and State is advising houses of worship nationwide to respect federal tax law and stay out of partisan politics.

Americans United announced today that 100,000 letters have been mailed to clergy and lay leaders reminding them that federal tax law prohibits tax-exempt entities, including houses of worship, from endorsing candidates.

“Houses of worship are supposed to tend to spiritual needs and do charitable work, not act as political action committees,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United executive director. “Our letter reminds religious leaders about what the law requires, why it makes sense and how it could affect them.”

The AU letters were sent to a broad cross-section of Christian denominations, as well as a selection of synagogues and mosques.

Said Lynn, “The vast majority of clergy of all faiths reject the idea that houses of worship should be politicized. But misguided religious and political forces persist in pressuring religious leaders to violate federal tax law. We urge clergy to just say no.”

The mass mailing comes on the heels of a project by the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), a Religious Right legal group, which last month urged evangelical Christian pastors to violate the law by endorsing or opposing candidates from the pulpit. Reportedly, 33 pastors took part in the ADF effort; Americans United has already filed complaints with the IRS about seven of them.

In addition to its mass mailing to houses of worship, Americans United is making various resources about church politicking available to religious leaders and laypeople through a Web site it created called projectfairplay.org.

Several recent polls, Lynn noted, have shown a majority of Americans opposing pulpit politicking. Americans of all political persuasions and faith backgrounds are increasingly saying they want their houses of worship to unite people, not divide them by introducing partisan politics.

“Church-based electioneering drives wedges into congregations, violates federal tax law and distracts from the true mission of the religious community,” Lynn said. “It’s a bad deal all around.”

Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State  www.au.org

                          ==========

AU Press Release :: AU reports Federal Tax Law Violations in New Jersey, New Mexico

October 22, 2008

IRS Should Investigate N.J. Catholic Diocese For Campaign Intervention, Says Americans United

Church-State Watchdog Group Asks Tax Agency To Examine Political Activity By Bishop Of Paterson

Americans United for Separation of Church and State has called on the Internal Revenue Service to investigate the Roman Catholic Diocese of Paterson, N.J., after its bishop published a letter advising congregants not to vote for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

In the letter, titled “A Politician’s Promise: No Right to Life! No Freedom!,” Bishop Arthur J. Serratelli compared Obama to Herod Antipas, the New Testament ruler who is notorious for ordering the beheading of John the Baptist.

Serratelli criticized Obama for telling a pro-choice group that he would sign legislation protecting abortion rights. Referring to Obama as “the present democratic candidate,” Serratelli attacked his voting record on abortion and asserted, “Today we live in a democracy. We choose our leaders who make our laws. Every vote counts. Today, either we choose to respect and protect life, especially the life of the child in the womb of the mother or we sanction the loss of our most basic freedoms. At this point, we are still free to choose!”

Complete article at:

http://tinyurl.com/6rv8bq

New Mexico Church Violated Federal Tax Law With Pro-Republican Sign, Says Americans United

Church-State Watchdog Group Asks IRS To Investigate Rock Christian Fellowship For Tax Law Violations

A New Mexico church violated federal tax law by posting a sign encouraging voters to support Republican candidates over Democratic ones, Americans United for Separation of Church and State has told the Internal Revenue Service.

Rock Christian Fellowship in Espanola has posted two large photos on its building. One depicts an aborted fetus and has underneath it three last names of Democratic candidates: Obama, Udall and Lujan. (Barack Obama is the Democratic candidate for president, Tom Udall is a candidate for U.S. Senate and Ben Ray Lujan is a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives.)

The other photo is of a healthy baby and has below it three last names of Republican candidates: McCain, Pearce and East. (John McCain is the GOP candidate for president, while Steve Pearce is a candidate for Senate and Dan East is a candidate for the U.S. House.)

Complete article at:

http://tinyurl.com/593mhl

Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State  www.au.org

                          ==========

Charged preacher denies impersonating officer (w/video) … and more

Houston Chronicle – United States

Ronald Steve Smith, 49, minister at New Mount Calvary Missionary Baptist Church, is charged with impersonating a peace officer, a third-degree felony. …

http://tinyurl.com/585u5w (www.chron.com)

WAAYTV.com – Huntsville, Alabama – News Weather, Sports

DECATUR,AL- A youth minister is accused of sexually abusing a 14-year-old boy. … Youth Minister Charged With Sexual Abuse. Close window …

http://tinyurl.com/6a7ps9 (www.waaytv.com)

Former Teen Inmate Files Sex Abuse Suit Against Late Catholic …

AHN – USA

Eugene Clarahan of the Diocese of Wilmington appears to have molested a number of minors as another sex abuse victim filed a lawsuit against the ex-priest. …

http://tinyurl.com/5szxke (www.allheadlinenews.com)

Former altar boy sues priest, diocese

CharlotteObserver.com – Charlotte,NC,USA

The plaintiff kept the alleged sexual abuse secret until 2007, the suit says, when he told his sister. He then told mental health professionals.

http://tinyurl.com/6mbygt (www.charlotteobserver.com)

                          ==========

Relativity

Einstein climbs to the top of Mt. Sinai to get close enough to talk to God.

Looking up, he asks the Lord… “God, what does a million years mean to you?”

The Lord replies, “A minute.”

Einstein asks, “And what does a million dollars mean to you?”

The Lord replies, “A penny.”

Einstein asks, “Can I have a penny?”

The Lord replies, “In a minute.”

                          ==========

three thousand words

Don Addis: exodus ramp

http://tinyurl.com/69cd4y

RUDIS MUIZNIEKS: blah blah eternal hell blah …

http://tinyurl.com/68t38n

JEFF SWENSON: … we accidentally removed your soul …

http://tinyurl.com/65ejyw