Archive for November, 2008

Monday November 24, 2008 – Ism’s in my opinion are not good. – Ferris Bueller

Monday, November 24th, 2008

Taxpayers for Common Sense: Ending the Backroom Bailout

Ending the Backroom Bailout
Volume XIII No. 47 – November 21, 2008

During negotiations over the bailout bill, Congress was able to force the Administration to accept several oversight and accountability provisions on this massive bill.  These provisions—an outside review panel and an Inspector General—were designed to take the decisions about the bailout out of the backrooms of the Department of Treasury and into the light of day.

But then the oversight plans fizzled.  After passing the bailout, lawmakers immediately skipped town to run for re-election, leaving Treasury with virtually no oversight while spending unprecedented amounts of taxpayer dollars.

With nearly half of the bailout money doled out, Congress is belatedly trying to play catch-up in getting the oversight structure in place. Neil Barofsky, a U.S. Attorney, was nominated last week to be the Inspector General for the bailout. The Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on his nomination on Wednesday of this week, but it is unclear if they will get the nomination through the floor any time soon.  In addition, Senators McCaskill (D-MO) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) are trying to get legislation through that clarifies the IG can review all aspects of the bailout, not just the shelved toxic asset acquisition portion, as well as ensure that he can staff his office quickly.

Congress also got around to filling the five member oversight panel this week. This group, too, is charged with overseeing the bailout, as well as reviewing the existing financial system and regulatory framework in order to make recommendations for improvement.

It shouldn’t take this long. Taxpayers have had to endure waste, fraud and abuse because of sluggish establishment of oversight. The Coalitional Provisional Authority (CPA) Inspector General (pre-cursor to the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction – SIGIR) wasn’t filled for a year after the CPA was created. Once established, SIGIR has proven invaluable at rooting out waste, conducting oversight and helping the reconstruction move forward. But much of their early work looked at the wild west of contracting and free flow of money that occurred prior to their arrival.

Equally telling was the experience after Hurricane Katrina. No special Inspector General was created, but the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General, Richard Skinner, quickly stood up a special operation and coordinated efforts with other agencies receiving Katrina relief funds to conduct robust oversight over the contracting operations. The joint IG effort was lead in the region by a separate Katrina oversight office and the team produced voluminous amounts of material and invaluable documentation to root out agency incompetence and waste, fraud, and abuse.

We can’t get back the last several weeks – when $290 billion of bailout funds were committed both to invest in dozens of banks and to further prop up American Insurance Group (AIG). Robust oversight and accountability could have helped assure taxpayers that these were the right banks to invest in, the banks were spending the money appropriately, that amounts invested were reasonable, and that taxpayers are likely to achieve the liquidity and stabilization goals that were used to justify these investments.

But by quickly confirming and staffing the new IG, and with active involvement by the congressional oversight panel, we can gain a better understanding of where Treasury decides to invest taxpayer money and why.  Congress still has a chance to bring oversight and accountability to the bailout and help ensure that the next $410 billion of the bailout is used responsibly and isn’t wasted.

Let us know what you think.

Going on at Taxpayer.net This Week

Ted Stevens’ Final Days in the Senate

TCS Statement on Colorado Public Awareness Effort on Energy

Final Regulations for Oil Shale Leasing on Federal Lands

FY2009 Appropriations Bills: TCS Analyses and Earmark Databases

Bailout Bank Bios

TCS Staff are compiling profiles of all financial institutions receiving funds under the 2008 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act. See all completed bios here.

TCS in the News

TCS was cited in dozens of stories this past week Check them all out in the Headlines About TCS section of our redesigned website.

Notable Quote

“It appears that you seem to be flying a $700 billion plane by the seat of your pants.”
–Rep. Gary Ackerman, (D-NY), speaking to Secretary of the Treasury Henry M. Paulson, Jr.

weekly wastebasket at www.taxpayer.net

 

                          ==========

THE DIRTY SECRET OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: OUR BANKING SYSTEM’S BROKEN

By William Greider, The Nation

No more free money from Washington. No more masters of the universe. No more business as usual. Time for a banking holiday.

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/108138/

                          ==========

2008 U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Annual Report

News release: “China relies on heavy-handed government control over its economy to maintain an export advantage over other countries. The result: China has amassed nearly $2 trillion in foreign exchange and has increasingly used its hoard to manipulate currency trading and diplomatic relations with other nations. These are among the concusions in the sixth Annual Report to Congress of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. “Rather than use this money for the benefit of its citizens—by funding pensions and erecting hospitals and schools, for example–China has been using the funds to seek political and economic influence over other nations,” said Larry Wortzel, chairman of the Commission, at the official release of the group’s 2008 report to Congress on Thursday.”

http://tinyurl.com/5oosse (www.uscc.gov)

                          ==========

National Intelligence Council Report – Global Trends 2025- A Transformed World Global Trends 2025:

A Transformed World, November 2008 – “We prepared Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World to stimulate strategic thinking about the future by identifying key trends, the factors that drive them, where they seem to be headed, and how they might interact. It uses scenarios to illustrate some of the many ways in which the drivers examined in the study (e.g., globalization, demography, the rise of new powers, the decay of international institutions, climate change, and the geopolitics of energy) may interact to generate challenges and opportunities for future decisionmakers. The study as a whole is more a description of the factors likely to shape events than a prediction of what will actually happen.”

http://tinyurl.com/5qct5u (www.dni.gov)

                          ==========

This Is Not A Normal Recession:     Moving on to Plan B 

By Mike Whitney
URL of this article:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=11072

Global Research, November 21, 2008
Information Clearinghouse 

“The Winter of 2008-2009 will prove to be the winter of global economic discontent that marks the rejection of the flawed ideology that unregulated global financial markets promote financial innovation, market efficiency, unhampered growth and endless prosperity while mitigating risk by spreading it system wide.” Economists Paul Davidson and Henry C.K. Liu “Open Letter to World Leaders attending the November 15 White House Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy”

The global economy is being sucked into a black hole and most Americans have no idea why. The whole problem can be narrowed down to two words; “structured finance”.

Structured finance is a term that designates a sector of finance where risk is transferred via complex legal and corporate entities. It’s not as confusing as it sounds. Take a mortgage-backed security (MBS), for example. The mortgage is issued by a bank (the loan originator) which then sells the mortgage to a brokerage where it is chopped up into tranches (pieces of the loan) and sold in a pool of mortgages to investors that are looking for a rate that is greater than Treasurys or similar investments. The process of transforming debt (“the mortgage”) into a security is called securitization. At one time, the MBS was a reasonably safe investment because the housing market was stable and there were relatively few foreclosures. Thus, the chance of losing one’s investment was quite small.

In the early years of the Bush administration, Wall Street took advantage of the gigantic flow of capital coming into the country ($700 billion per year via the current account deficit) by creating more and more MBSs and selling them to foreign banks, hedge funds and insurance companies. It was real gold rush. Because the banks were merely the mortgage originators, they didn’t believe their own money was at risk, so they gradually lowered lending standards and issued millions of loans to unqualified applicants who had no job, no collateral and a bad credit history. Securitization was such a hit, that by 2005, nearly 80 percent of all mortgages were securitized and the traditional criteria for getting a mortgage was abandoned altogether. Subprimes, Alt-As and ARMs flourished, while the “30 year fixed” went the way of the Dodo. Lenders were no longer constrained by “creditworthiness”; anyone with a pulse and a pen could get approved. The mortgages were then shipped off to Wall Street where they were sold to credulous investors.

The disaggregation of risk–spreading the risk to many investors via securitization–was as much of a factor in the creation of “the largest equity bubble in history”, as the banks lax lending standards or Greenspan’s low interest rates. By spreading risk throughout the system, securitization keeps interest rates artificially low because the real risks are not properly priced. The low interest rates, in turn, stimulate speculation which results in equity bubbles. Eventually, credit expansion leads to crisis when borrowers can no longer make the interest payments on their loans and defaults spiral out of control. This forces massive deleveraging and the fire-sale of assets in illiquid markets. As assets lose value, prices fall and the economy enters a deflationary cycle.

There are many types of of structured instruments including asset-backed securities (ABS), mortgage-backed securities (MBS), collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) all of which provide a revenue stream from loans that were chopped into tranches and turned into securities. There are many problems with these complex securities, the biggest of which is that there is no way to unravel the individual pools of loans to isolate the bad paper. That’s why subprime mortgages had such a destructive affect on the secondary market, because–even though subprimes only defaulted at a rate of roughly 5 percent–MBS sales slumped nearly 90 percent. Why? Former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O’Neill explained it like this: “It’s like you have 8 bottles of water and just one of them has arsenic in it. It becomes impossible to sell any of the other bottles because no one knows which one contains the poison.”

Exactly right. So why weren’t these structured debt-instruments “stress tested” before the markets were reworked and the financial system became so dependent on them?

Greed. Because the real purpose of these exotic investments is not to provide true value to the buyer, but to maximize profits for the seller by increasing leverage. That is the real purpose of MBS, CDOs and all the other bizarre-sounding derivatives; higher profits with less capital. It’s a scam. Here’s how it works: A mortgage applicant buys a house for $400,000 and puts 10 percent down. His mortgage is sold to Wall Street, chopped into pieces, and stitched together in a pool of similar loans. Now the brokerage can use the debt as if it were an asset, borrowing at ratios of 20 or 30 to 1 to fatten the bottom line. When Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken into conservatorship by the government, they were leveraged at an eye-popping 100 to 1. This shows that nearly an infinite amount of debt can be precariously balanced atop a paltry amount of capital. This explains why the $4 trillion aggregate value of the 5 big investment banks and the $1.7 trillion value of the hedge funds is now vanishing more quickly than it was created. Once the mighty gears of structured finance shift into reverse, deleveraging begins with a vengeance pulling trillions into a credit vacuum.

It all started when two Bear Stearns hedge funds defaulted in July 2006 and there were no offers for their MBS and other structured investments. Panic quickly spread to every corner of Wall Street as the alchemists of modern finance began to see that their worst nightmare might be realized, that trillions of dollars of Frankenstein investments could be worth nothing at all.

Since the Bear Stearns funds fiasco, there have been huge explosions in the financial markets. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Wachovia, Washington Mutual, Indybank, AIG, Lehman Bros and other industry giants have either gone under or been forced into shotgun weddings by the FDIC. The stock market has plunged over 40 percent and suffered wild gyrations not seen since the 1930s. The entire Wall Street landscape has changed completely. Investment banking is no longer a viable business model; the Big 5 have either vanished or transformed themselves into holding companies to escape short sellers. The hedge funds have been deleveraging with a ferocity that has sent sent stocks and commodities crashing. In one day last week, the stock market plunged 300 points in the morning only to bounce back 550 points a few hours later; a whopping 850 point-spread in one trading day! No one but a madman would dabble in this market. Cautious investors have pulled up stakes and moved to the safety of Treasurys. Meanwhile, the financial tsunami is roaring through the real economy where consumer confidence has plummeted, unemployment is soaring and retail sales have fallen to historic lows. The downdraft from the financial markets has flattened Main Street and set the stage for a humongous $500 billion stimulus package to be delivered in the first few months of the Obama administration. The meltdown appears to be playing out much like Henry Paulson anticipated. According to Bloomberg News : “Shortly after leaving Wall Street as Goldman Sachs’ CEO, Henry Paulson was at Camp David warning the president and his staff of “over-the-counter derivatives as an example of financial innovation that could, under certain circumstances, blow up in Wall Street’s face and affect the whole economy.” (PAUL B. FARRELL, “30 reasons for Great Depression 2 by 2011″, MarketWatch)

So far, the Federal Reserve has provided nearly $2 trillion through its lending facilities just to keep the financial system upright. The Treasury is currently distributing $700 billion to key banks and other financial institutions that are perceived to be “too big to fail”. In truth, the “too big to fail” mantra is a just public relations hoax to conceal the web of counterparty deals that make it impossible for one institution to fail without dominoing through the rest of the system and wreaking havoc. That’s why AIG is still on life-support with regular injections of taxpayer money; because it had roughly $4 trillion of credit default swaps (structured “hedges” that are not traded on a regulated exchange) for which AIG does not have sufficient capital reserves. In other words, the taxpayer is now paying the debts of an insurance company that didn’t set aside the money to pay its claims. (As yet, No SEC indictments for securities fraud) In fact, the Fed and Treasury are now providing a backstop for the entire structured finance system which is frozen solid and shows no sign of thawing any time soon.

This is not a normal recession, which is a downturn in the business cycle and “a period of reduced economic activity” usually brought on by a mismatch between supply and demand. (that ends in two quarters of negative growth) The present situation is much more grave; it is the utter destruction of a system that was developed fairly recently and has proven to be thoroughly dysfunctional. It cannot withstand the effects of tighter credit or adverse market conditions. This is not a cyclical downturn; the structured finance system has collapsed leaving behind a multi-trillion dollar capital hole that is bringing the broader economy to its knees.

One by one, we have seen the structured instruments fail; mortgage-backed securities (MBS), collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), credit default swaps (CDS), commercial paper (CP), auction rate securities. Now we are seeing investors boycott anything related to structured investments. This is from Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis:

“There were NO sales of bonds backed by credit-card payments in October, the first time since 1993, when the asset-backed securities market was in its infancy. Yields on top-rated credit card bonds relative to benchmark interest rates reached a record high of 525 basis points more than the London interbank offered rate, or Libor, last week, according to Bank of America Corp. data.”

Wall Street has turned off the faucet for securitized investments. That market is toast. The only reason that Libor and the other gauges of interbank lending have normalized is because the Fed guaranteed money markets and commercial paper. It has nothing to do with trust between the banks themselves. There is no trust. Even so, the banks are not capable of making up for the vast amount of credit which was produced by the now-defunct investment banks and hedge funds which are constrained by losses of nearly $3.5 trillion; half of their total value. In the best case scenario, bank credit will only shrink 15 or 20 percent, which will put the US on track for a deep “18 month to 2 year” recession rather than another Great Depression.

Paulson’s attempt to divert $30 billion to non-bank financial institutions to revive loan securitization when there is no appetite among investors for such structured junk is pure folly. More troubling, is that neither Paulson nor Bernanke have a Plan B; an alternate scheme for rebuilding the financial markets on a solid, sustainable foundation rather than low interest rates and pools of debt. Everything they have done so far, suggests that they are focused on one thing alone; inflating another equity bubble. “Inflate or die”, as the saying goes; and Bernanke intends to achieve this objective using the same tools that brought us to the brink of catastrophe. Here’s a clip from a recent speech by Bernanke which shows his determination to prop up the broken system:

“The ability of financial intermediaries to sell the mortgages they originate into the broader capital market by means of the securitization process serves two important purposes: First, it provides originators much wider sources of funding than they could obtain through conventional sources, such as retail deposits; second, it substantially reduces the originator’s exposure to interest rate, credit, prepayment, and other risks associated with holding mortgages to maturity, thereby reducing the overall costs of providing mortgage credit.”

Sorry, Ben, the funding has dried up and the banks have shown no interest in going back to the days of conventional “30-year fixed” mortgages. It’s a dead letter. The Fed and Treasury need to stop looking for ways to reflate the bubble and work to restore confidence in the markets by increasing regulation and reducing the amount of leverage that’s allowable to 12 to 1. After all, it’s no coincidence that AIG, Fannie and Freddie, Lehman Bros, General Motors, General Electric have all fallen off a cliff at the very same time. They are all victims of the same low interest, easy money finance swindle which allowed them to roll over huge amounts of short-term debt at artificially low cost. When Bear blew up; lending tightened, demand weakened, and credit was flushed from the system at an unprecedented pace. Borrowing short for long-term investments is not feasible when credit becomes scarce, but it’s not because the banks aren’t lending. That’s just another myth that keeps the public from seeing what’s really going on. As Jon Hilsenrath points out in his Wall Street Journal article, “Banks Keep Lending, but that isn’t easing the crisis”, that is not the case:

“Banks actually are lending at record levels. Their commercial and industrial loans, at $1.6 trillion in early November, were up 15% from a year earlier and grew at a 25% annual rate during the past three months, according to weekly Federal Reserve data. Home-equity loans, at $578 billion, were up 21% from a year ago and grew at a 48% annual rate in three months….The numbers point to one of the great challenges of the crisis. The credit crunch is surely real, but it is complex and not easily managed. Banks are lending, but they’re also under serious strain as they act as backstops to a larger problem — the breakdown of securities markets..The worst of the credit crisis is being felt not in banks but in financial markets…”

The banks are not to blame. There is a generalized contraction of credit in the non-bank financial system where structured finance has blown up and taken half of Wall Street with it. It’s the end of an era. Here’s how economist Henry C. K. Liu sums it up in his “Open Letter to World Leaders attending the November 15 White House Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy”:

“Neoliberal economists in the last three decades have denied the possibility of a replay of the worldwide destructiveness of the Great Depression that followed the collapse of the speculative bubble created by unfettered US financial markets of the ‘Roaring Twenties’. They fooled themselves into thinking that false prosperity built on debt could be sustainable with monetary indulgence. Now history is repeating itself, this time with a new, more lethal virus that has infested deregulated global financial markets with ‘innovative’ debt securitization, structured finance and maverick banking operations flooded with excess liquidity released by accommodative central banks. A massive structure of phantom wealth was built on the quicksand of debt manipulation. This debt bubble finally imploded in July 2007 and is now threatening to bring down the entire global financial system to cause an economic meltdown unless enlightened political leadership adopts coordinated corrective measures on a global scale.”

Rome is burning. It’s time to stop tinkering with a failed system and move on to “Plan B” before it’s too late.

                          ==========

Mega barf alert! U.S. government may rescue Citigroup

 

22 Nov 2008

The U.S. government may step in to rescue Citigroup Inc. after a crisis in confidence erased half the bank’s stock-market value in three days, according to investors and analysts. Citigroup’s $2 trillion of assets dwarfs companies such as American International Group Inc. that got support from the U.S. government this year. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke may favor a rescue to avoid the chaotic aftermath of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s bankruptcy in September.

At:

http://tinyurl.com/5l22q3 (www.bloomberg.com)

From: CLG News

                          ==========

Attacking Media Matters, O’Reilly falsely claimed he said “Coleman’s victory was certified by the state … which is absolutely true” — but it’s not

Attacking Media Matters on his radio show for noting that his previous claim that Sen. Norm Coleman “was certified the winner” in the Minnesota Senate race was false, Bill O’Reilly repeated the falsehood, claiming: “[W]hat I said was, Coleman’s victory was certified by the state because it was. He had 215 more votes, which is absolutely true.” In fact, the Minnesota State Canvassing Board did not “certif[y]” a “victory” for Coleman or Al Franken, having authorized an automatic recount of ballots for that race; Minnesota election law states that “no certificate of election shall be prepared or delivered until after the recount is completed.”

 Read More

http://mediamatters.org/items/200811210012?lid=768808&rid=18184081

                          ==========

GLENN BECK WONDERS WHY HE’S RESENTED AS A BIGOT

By Steve Rendall, FAIR

It takes an angry truck driver who threatened the hate-spewing host to wonder, “Is this what who we’ve
become?”

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/108139/

                          ==========

Borowitz Report – Obama Cabinet Shocker

November 22, 2008

Obama Names Angelina Jolie, Jennifer Aniston to ‘Team of Rivals’
Praises Actresses’ Mutual Hatred
 

Continuing in his quest to assemble a so-called “team of rivals,” President-elect Barack Obama today announced that he would name Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston to key Cabinet positions.

The two actresses, who have been perennial tabloid fodder as a result of their longstanding feud over actor Brad Pitt, were surprise choices for Mr. Obama’s Cabinet, since neither of them has been a government official or even portrayed one in a movie.

But in his weekly Internet address, the President-elect explained his rationale for choosing the sworn enemies to his Cabinet: “I chose Jennifer and Angelina for the same reason I have chosen every other Cabinet member: they clearly despise each other with a passion.”

While Mr. Obama was vague about which Cabinet positions the two actresses would ultimately hold, insiders said that Ms. Jolie was a shoo-in for Secretary of Labor.

Doris Kearns Goodwin, historian and author of the book Team of Rivals, said that she was “thrilled” by the selection of the two actresses to Mr. Obama’s Cabinet.

“Every time someone says ‘team of rivals,’ I sell another book on Amazon,” she said.  “Team of rivals, team of rivals, team of rivals.”

Upcoming Events

January 1, 2009 at 12:01AM

Andy’s 2009 Shows
Watch this space for Andy’s performances in 2009.

http://www.borowitzreport.com/

                          ==========

three thousand words

Tom Toles: I thought we were having a love affair!

http://tinyurl.com/5fwwqd (d.yimg.com)

RJ Matson: BAILOUT PARDONS

http://tinyurl.com/5fsebz (www.rjmatson.com)

Matt Davies: washington leadership

http://tinyurl.com/5blrm5 (editorialcartoonists.com)

Sunday November 23, 2008 – All religion is simply evolved out of fraud, fear, greed, imagination, and poetry. Edgar Allen Poe

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008

Priest: No communion for Obama supporters –Priest says it’s because the Democratic president-elect supports abortion

13 Nov 2008

South Carolina Roman Catholic priest has told his parishioners that they should refrain from receiving Holy Communion if they voted for Barack Obama because the Democratic president-elect supports abortion, and supporting him “constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil.” The Rev. Jay Scott Newman said in a letter distributed Sunday to parishioners at St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Greenville that they are putting their souls at risk if they take Holy Communion before doing penance for their vote. [And, parishioners are putting their sanity at risk, listening to this Reichwing nutjob.]

At:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27705755/

From: CLG News

                          ==========

HAS NEWSWEEK GONE MAD? NEW ARTICLE GIVES VOICE TO ANTICHRIST WHACK JOBS

By Steve Benen, Washington Monthly

Sickening: Newsweek publishes a 600-word piece on those who wonder about Obama being the Antichrist.

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/107597/

                          ==========

ANTI-CHOICE ADVOCATES OPPOSE MEASURES THAT ACTUALLY DECREASE THE ABORTION RATE?

By Jill Filipovic, Feministe

When you think about it, it really isn’t that surprising. Logic has never been their strong suit.

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/107615/

                          ==========

HUCKABEE CLAIMS CIVIL RIGHTS OF GAYS ARE NOT BEING VIOLATED: THEY AREN’T GETTING THEIR ‘SKULLS CRACKED’

By Ali Frick, Think Progress

The dangerous violence threshold argument.

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/107698/

                          ==========

AU Press Release :: Texas State School Board Should Uphold Sound Science, Reject Creationism, Says AU

November 19, 2008

Texas State School Board Should Uphold Sound Science, Reject Creationism, Says Americans United

Religious Right Push For Creationist Concepts In Texas Science Standards Could Damage Textbooks Nationwide, Says AU’s Lynn

Americans United for Separation of Church and State today urged the Texas State Board of Education to stick to sound science and reject creationist concepts when revising its science standards.

The state school board is currently examining the science curriculum, which is reviewed and updated every 10 years. The Seattle-based Discovery Institute and other Religious Right forces are seeking to include loopholes that undermine instruction about evolution and open the door to creationist ideas.

Scientists, teachers, mainstream religious leaders and civil liberties activists want to improve the Texas standards to ensure that the public school classroom does not become a vehicle for religious indoctrination.

“Public schools should educate, not indoctrinate,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United executive director. “The Religious Right is exploiting Texas public schools to push a narrow viewpoint and in the process is doing a great disservice to its students, not to mention undermining the mandates of our Constitution.”

The battle in Texas is focused on Religious Right-backed language currently in the standards that requires schools to teach the “strengths and weaknesses” of evolution. That wording, experts say, is an invitation to introduce creationist concepts based on fundamentalist religion, not science.

“Let’s just hope members of the Texas school board recognize the ‘strengths and weaknesses’ language for what it is,” Lynn concluded. “If they don’t, they could be inviting public school districts to face some costly litigation.”

In its letter to the board, Americans United makes it clear that litigation may result if religious beliefs are introduced into public school science classrooms.

The board’s decision, which is expected to be made in March, could influence science instruction across the country. Texas is the second largest purchaser of textbooks, after California. To meet Texas standards, textbook producers may include creationist concepts in books that would circulate nationally.

A hearing is scheduled for today in Austin for individuals and groups to testify on the curriculum.

Religious Right groups have already succeeded in pushing through their agenda in Louisiana, which now allows science teachers to use “supplemental materials” to teach the “strengths and weaknesses” of evolution. AU is closely monitoring whether religious beliefs are being introduced unconstitutionally as science by teachers in Louisiana.

The federal courts have repeatedly struck down other tactics used by the Religious Right to push religion in public science classes. In 1987, the U.S. Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard invalidated a Louisiana statute requiring science educators to “balance” teaching evolution concepts with “creation science” concepts.

In 2005, a federal district court said in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District that Pennsylvania public schools cannot teach “intelligent design,” a creationist concept that claims the universe and living things were created by an “intelligent cause.” The court ruled “intelligent design” unconstitutional for use in public schools because it is unscientific and religious.
 

Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State  www.au.org

                          ==========

Updated 11/15: Church trial finds pastor guilty of sex abuse … and more

River Forest Leaves – Oak Park,IL,USA

Hokanson, now 37, said she hopes others who have been victims of pastor sex abuse will come forward. “The shame is so high … but I want people to know I …

http://tinyurl.com/5p8sct (www.pioneerlocal.com)

Commission finds minister had sex with minor

Chicago Tribune – United States

Campbell’s attorney says his client denies the allegations of sexual abuse, and the lawyer says he’s never been charged with a crime.

http://tinyurl.com/6g7ddk (www.chicagotribune.com)

Spokane priest abuse cases settled

TheNewsTribune.com – Tacoma,WA,USA

He was a priest in the Spokane Diocese in the 1970s and early 1980s. When parents complained about the sex abuse, he was sent quietly away for treatment and …

http://tinyurl.com/59zy64 (www.thenewstribune.com)

Church commission finds minister had sex with minor

Belleville News Democrat – IL, USA

Campbell has not been charged criminally. The Presbytery of Chicago said the state’s statute of limitations had run out when the woman came forward two …

http://www.bnd.com/326/story/544534.html

Monroe minister charged with child porn -

The Connecticut Post Online

David Esarey, 30, the youth minister at Stepney Baptist Church, was charged Wednesday with employing a minor in an obscene performance, third-degree child …

http://tinyurl.com/5ucp8r (www.connpost.com)

                          ==========

three thousand words

Jimmy Margulies: which part of separation of church and state do you not understand?!

http://tinyurl.com/6k8gru (editorialcartoonists.com)

Ed Stein: season’s greetings

http://tinyurl.com/5nrmxe (editorialcartoonists.com)

Don Addis: church / state

http://tinyurl.com/5stwhc (ffrf.org)

Saturday November 22, 2008 – “Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power” – Benito Mussolini

Saturday, November 22nd, 2008

Pirates & TARP 

SOMALI PIRATES APPLY TO BECOME BANK TO ACCESS TARP

PAULSON: TARP PIRATE EQUITY IS AN “INVESTMENT,” WILL PAY OFF

KASHKARI SAYS “SOMALI PIRATES ARE ‘FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND’ ”

Moody’s upgrade Somali Pirates to AAA

HUD SAYS SOMALI DHOW FORECLOSURE PROGRAM HAD “VERY LOW” PARTICIPATION

SOMALI PIRATES IN DISCUSSION TO ACQUIRE CITIBANK

FED OFFICIALS: AGGRESSIVE EASING WOULD CUT SOMALI PIRATE RISK

FED AGREED OCT. 29 TO TAKE `WHATEVER STEPS’ NEEDED FOR SOMALI PIRATES

                          ==========

ECON-OCALYPSE: DOW DROPS BELOW 7,600, NO DEAL REACHED ON AUTO BAILOUT

By Ian Welsh, Firedoglake

There is no technical support below 8K, so where it ends now is not known.

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/107987/

                          ==========

Sweet Payoffs for Troubled Industries’ CEOs

by Kristin Jones, ProPublica -
November 20, 2008

Chairman and Chief Executive Charles Schwab listens as President Bush announces the President’s Advisory Council on Financial Literacy. (Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images)Even as the Dow flirts with the 7,000s, not everyone is suffering. The Wall Street Journal today looks at CEOs in companies directly related to the financial crisis — including mortgage financers and insurers, student loan companies and home builders — who have done quite nicely, thank you very much.

The Journal’s analysis looks at executive compensation and stock sales for the period between July 2003 and June 2008. At the top of the list of those who enriched themselves is Charles Schwab, CEO of the brokerage firm of the same name, who took home $816.6 million largely in sales of his shares.

While Schwab’s company continues to hold up well during the crisis, others have sunk. High-profile names on the list include congressional enemy No. 1 Richard Fuld ($184.6 million) of Lehman Brothers and James Cayne ($163.2 million) of Bear Stearns.

The Journal points out that others got rich quietly, and in delightful settings. Meet Daniel Meyers, 46, the chief executive of First Marblehead, a Boston-based company that helped banks provide high-interest student-loan services to those who had exhausted federally funded options:

In 2004, Mr. Meyers bought a Spanish-style villa in Newport, R.I., the summer retreat of industrialists a century ago. He paid $10.3 million for the estate, on 45 acres with sweeping views of the Atlantic. Mr. Meyers tore down the villa and is constructing a five-building, 38,000-square-foot compound called Seaward with a carriage house, a guest house and a caretaker’s cottage. Mr. Meyers also owns a 66-foot sailing yacht, which he recently raced to a win at the famed Newport Regatta.

Meyers cashed in his $95.8 million before the downside of subprime student loans caught up with his company:

In the credit crunch, First Marblehead’s business ground to a halt after investors abandoned private student loans, which are experiencing rising defaults.

The Journal paints the lavish lifestyles of several other CEOs, including Michael Gooch, 50, of credit-default swap broker GFI Group, Inc. With a $82.5 million payoff, he is at no risk of default himself:

Mr. Gooch says his only major debt is a $1 million mortgage. “It could be paid off with the spare change in my bank account,” he says.

The analysis doesn’t include most golden parachutes or stock options, unless they were sold.

http://tinyurl.com/5shhxo (www.propublica.org)

                          ==========

The Crisis & What to Do About It

By George Soros

The salient feature of the current financial crisis is that it was not caused by some external shock like OPEC raising the price of oil or a particular country or financial institution defaulting. The crisis was generated by the financial system itself. This fact—that the defect was inherent in the system —contradicts the prevailing theory, which holds that financial markets tend toward equilibrium and that deviations from the equilibrium either occur in a random manner or are caused by some sudden external event to which markets have difficulty adjusting. The severity and amplitude of the crisis provides convincing evidence that there is something fundamentally wrong with this prevailing theory and with the approach to market regulation that has gone with it. To understand what has happened, and what should be done to avoid such a catastrophic crisis in the future, will require a new way of thinking about how markets work.

Click here to read the entire article.

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22113

More articles and essays by George Soros can be found at

www.georgesoros.com

                          ==========

Lawmaker accuses Bush of secrecy over Iraq deal

Washington Post
http://tinyurl.com/5kyqu9 (www.washingtonpost.com)

By Ross Colvin, Reuters

November 19, 2008

Washington (Reuters) – The U.S. government is refusing to make public the security pact it has signed with Iraq, even though it has already been published in full in an Iraqi newspaper, a congressional hearing was told on Wednesday….

OONA HATHAWAY, A LAW PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, said it appeared the agreement would give the joint committee operational control over U.S. military operations. If so, that would be “unprecedented and extremely unusual,” she said.

“The president can enter into agreements on his own but this agreement goes far beyond the president’s independent constitutional powers,” Hathaway said.

She said challenging the legality of the agreement was compounded by the vagueness of much of its wording. She said standard SOFAs are several hundred pages, but the Iraqi one was a little over 20 pages….

[This story also appeared in the http://tinyurl.com/5bqwhg (www.iht.com)

Other stories quoting Professor Hathaway on this topic appeared in the http://tinyurl.com/5djgbb (www.boston.com) and on http://tinyurl.com/6sycsx (www.voanews.com)

                          ==========

Quinn trivializes same-sex marriage effort, claiming: "[G]ays never wanted to get married until … about five years ago”

Radio host Jim Quinn claimed that heterosexual opponents of Proposition 8 are “guilty straights” and suggested that “gays never wanted to get married until … about five years ago.” In fact, same-sex couples have brought court cases to overturn bans on same-sex marriage for decades.

Read More

http://mediamatters.org/items/200811200013?lid=762935&rid=18071131

                          ==========

The Barrio Azteca Trial and the Prison Gang-Cartel Interface

November 19, 2008

By Fred Burton and Ben West

On Nov. 3, a U.S. District Court in El Paso, Texas, began hearing a case concerning members of a criminal enterprise that calls itself Barrio Azteca (BA). The group members face charges including drug trafficking and distribution, extortion, money laundering and murder. The six defendants include the organization’s three bosses, Benjamin Alvarez, Manuel Cardoza and Carlos Perea; a sergeant in the group, Said Francisco Herrera; a lieutenant, Eugene Mona; and an associate, Arturo Enriquez.

The proceedings represent the first major trial involving BA, which operates in El Paso and West Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. The testimony is revealing much about how this El Paso-based prison gang operates, and how it interfaces with Mexican drug cartel allies that supply its drugs.

Mexico’s cartels are in the business of selling drugs like marijuana, cocaine and heroin in the United States. Large amounts of narcotics flow north while large amounts of cash and weapons flow south. Managing these transactions requires that the cartels have a physical presence in the United States, something a cartel alliance with a U.S. gang can provide.

Of course, BA is not the only prison gang operating in the United States with ties to Mexico. Prison gangs can also be called street gangs — they recruit both in prisons and on the street. Within the United States, there are at least nine well-established prison gangs with connections to Mexican drug cartels; Hermanos de Pistoleros Latinos, the Mexican Mafia and the Texas Syndicate are just a few such groups. Prison gangs like BA are very territorial and usually cover only a specific region, so one Mexican cartel might work with three to four prison or street gangs in the United States. Like BA, most of the U.S. gangs allied with Mexican cartels largely are composed of Mexican immigrants or Mexican-Americans. Nevertheless, white supremacist groups, mixed-race motorcycle gangs and African-American street gangs also have formed extensive alliances with Mexican cartels.

Certainly, not all U.S. gangs the Mexican cartels have allied with are the same. But examining how BA operates offers insights into how other gangs — like the Latin Kings, the Texas Syndicate, the Sureños, outlaw motorcycle gangs, and transnational street gangs like MS-13 — operate in alliance with the cartels.

Barrio Azteca Up Close

Spanish for “Aztec Neighborhood,” BA originated in a Texas state penitentiary in 1986, when five inmates from El Paso organized the group as a means of protection in the face of the often-brutal ethnic tensions within prisons. By the 1990s, BA had spread to other prisons and had established a strong presence on the streets of El Paso as its founding members served their terms and were released. Reports indicate that in the late 1990s, BA had begun working with Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman’s Sinaloa Federation drug trafficking organization, which at the time controlled drug shipments to Ciudad Juarez, El Paso’s sister city across the Rio Grande.

According to testimony from several different witnesses on both sides of the current trial, BA now works only with the Juarez cartel of Vicente Carrillo-Fuentes, which has long controlled much of Mexico’s Chihuahua state and Ciudad Juarez, and broke with the Sinaloa Federation earlier in 2008. BA took sides with the Juarez cartel, with which it is jointly running drugs across the border at the Juarez plaza.

BA provides the foot soldiers to carry out hits at the behest of Juarez cartel leaders. On Nov. 3, 10 alleged BA members in Ciudad Juarez were arrested in connection with 12 murders. The suspects were armed with four AK-47s, pistols and radio communication equipment — all hallmarks of a team of hit men ready to carry out a mission.

According to testimony from the ongoing federal case, which is being brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, drugs are taken at discount from the supplier on the Mexico side and then distributed to dealers on the street. These distributors must then pay “taxes” to BA collectors to continue plying their trade. According to testimony from Josue Aguirre, a former BA member turned FBI informant, BA collects taxes from 47 different street-level narcotics operations in El Paso alone. Failure to pay these taxes results in death. One of the murder charges in the current RICO case involves the death of an El Paso dealer who failed to pay up when the collectors arrived to collect on a debt.

Once collected, the money goes in several different directions. First, BA lieutenants and captains, the midlevel members, receive $50 and $200 per month respectively for compensation. The bulk of BA’s profit is then transferred using money orders to accounts belonging to the head bosses (like Alvarez, Cardoza and Perea) in prison. Cash is also brought back to Ciudad Juarez to pay the Juarez cartel, which provided the drugs in the first place.

BA receives discounts on drugs from the Juarez cartel by providing tactical help to its associates south of the border. Leaders of Carrillo Fuentes’ organization in Juarez can go into hiding in El Paso under BA protection if their lives are in danger in Juarez. They can also order BA to track down cartel enemies hiding in El Paso. Former BA member Gustavo Gallardo testified in 2005 that he was sent to pick up a man in downtown El Paso who had cheated the Juarez cartel of money. Once Gallardo dropped him off at a safe house in El Paso, another team took the man — who was bound with rope and duct tape — to Ciudad Juarez, where Gallardo assumes he was killed.

BA and the World of Prison Gangs

Prison gangs are endemic to prison systems, where safety for inmates comes in numbers. Tensions (usually along racial lines) among dangerous individuals regularly erupt into deadly conflict. Prison gang membership affords a certain amount of protection against rival groups and offers fertile recruiting ground.

Once a prison gang grows its membership (along with its prestige) and establishes a clear hierarchy, its leader can wield an impressive amount of power. Some even wind up taking over prisons, like the antecedents of Russian organized crime did.

It might seem strange that members on the outside send money and answer to bosses in prison, since the bosses are locked up. But these bosses wield a great deal of influence over gang members in and out of prison. Disobedience is punishable by death, and regardless of whether a boss is in prison, he can order a hit on a member who has crossed him. Prison gang members also know that if they end up in prison again — a likely outcome — they will once again be dependent on the help of the boss to stay alive, and can perhaps even earn some money while doing time.

BA’s illegal activities mean its members constantly cycle in and out of prison. Many BA members were involved in smaller, local El Paso street gangs before they were imprisoned. Once in prison, they joined BA with the sponsorship of a “godfather” who walks the recruit through the process. BA then performs a kind of background check on new recruits by circulating their name throughout the organization. BA is particularly interested in any evidence that prospective members have cooperated with the police.

Prison authorities are certainly aware of the spread of BA, and they try to keep Mexican nationals separated from known BA members, who are mostly Mexican-American, to prevent the spread of the gang’s influence. BA has organizations in virtually every penitentiary in Texas, meaning that no matter where a BA member is imprisoned, he will have a protection network in place. BA members with truly extensive prison records might personally know the leader of every prison chapter, thus increasing the member’s prestige. Thus, the constant cycling of members from the outside world into prison does not inhibit BA, but makes its members more cohesive, as it allows the prison system to increase bonds among gang members.

Communication challenges certainly arise, as exchanges between prisoners and those on the outside are closely monitored. But BA seems to have overcome this challenge. Former BA member Edward Ruiz testified during the trial that from 2003 to 2007, he acted as a clearinghouse for jailed members’ letters and packages, which he then distributed to members on the outside. This tactic ensured that all prison communications would be traceable to just one address, thus not revealing the location of other members.

BA also allegedly used Sandy Valles New, who worked in the investigations section of the Office of the Federal Public Defender in El Paso from 1996 to 2002, to pass communications between gang members inside and outside prison. She exploited the access to — and the ability to engage in confidential communications with — inmates that attorneys enjoy, transmitting information back and forth between BA members inside and outside prison. Taped conversations reveal New talking to one of the bosses and lead defendants, Carlos Perea, about her fear of losing her job and thus not being able to continue transmitting information in this way. She also talked of crossing over to Ciudad Juarez to communicate with BA members in Mexico.

While BA had inside sources like New assisting it, the FBI was able to infiltrate BA in return. Josue Aguirre and Johnny Michelleti have informed on BA activities to the FBI since 2003 and 2005, respectively. Edward Ruiz, the mailman, also handed over stacks of letters to the FBI.

BA and the Mexican Cartels

As indicated, BA is only one of dozens of prison gangs operating along the U.S.-Mexican border that help Mexican drug trafficking organizations smuggle narcotics across the border and then distribute them for the cartels. Mexican drug trafficking organizations need groups that will do their bidding on the U.S. side of the border, as the border is the tightest choke point in the narcotics supply chain.

Getting large amounts of drugs across the border on a daily basis requires local connections to bribe border guards or border town policemen. Gangs on the U.S. side of the border also have contacts who sell drugs on the retail level, where markups bring in large profits. The current trial has revealed that the partnership goes beyond narcotics to include violence as well. In light of the high levels of violence raging in Mexico related to narcotics trafficking, there is a genuine worry that this violence (and corruption) could spread inside the United States.

One of the roles that BA and other border gangs fill for Mexican drug-trafficking organizations is that of enforcer. Prison gangs wield tight control over illegal activity in a specific territory. They keep tabs on people to make sure they are paying their taxes to the gang and not affiliating with rival gangs. To draw an analogy, they are like the local police who know the situation on the ground and can enforce specific rules handed down by a governmental body — or a Mexican cartel.

Details emerging from the ongoing trial indicate that BA works closely with the Juarez cartel and has contributed to drug-related violence inside the United States. While the killing of a street dealer by a gang for failure to pay up on time is common enough nationwide and hardly unique to Mexican drug traffickers, apprehending offenders in El Paso and driving them to Ciudad Juarez to be held or killed does represent a very clear link between violence in Mexico and the United States.

BA’s ability to strike within the United States has been proven. According to a Stratfor source, BA is connected to Los Zetas — the U.S.-trained Mexican military members who deserted to traffic drugs — through a mutual alliance with the Juarez cartel. The Zetas possess a high level of tactical skill that could be passed along to BA, thus increasing its effectiveness.

The Potential for Cross-Border Violence

The prospect for enhanced cross-border violence is frightening, but the violence itself is not new. So far, Mexican cartels and their U.S. allies have focused on those directly involved in the drug trade. Whether this restraint will continue is unclear. Either way, collateral damage is always a possibility.

Previous incidents, like one that targeted a drug dealer in arrears in Phoenix and others that involved kidnappings and attacks against U.S. Border Patrol agents, indicate that violence has already begun creeping over from Mexico. So far, violence related to drug trafficking has not caused the deaths of U.S. law enforcement officials and/or civilians, though it has come close to doing so.

Another potential incubator of cross-border violence exists in BA’s obligation to offer refuge to Juarez cartel members seeking safety in the United States. Such members most likely would have bounties on their heads. The more violent Mexico (and particularly Ciudad Juarez) becomes, the greater the risk Juarez cartel leaders face — and the more pressure they will feel to seek refuge in the United States. As more Juarez cartel leaders cross over and hide with BA help, the cartel’s enemies will become increasingly tempted to follow them and kill them in the United States. Other border gangs in California, Arizona and New Mexico probably are following this same trajectory.

Two primary reasons explain why Mexican cartel violence for the most part has stopped short of crossing the U.S. border. First, the prospect of provoking U.S. law enforcement does not appeal to Mexican drug-trafficking organizations operating along the border. They do not want to provoke a coordinated response from a highly capable federal U.S. police force like the Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, or FBI. By keeping violence at relatively low levels and primarily aimed at other gang members and drug dealers, the Mexican drug-trafficking organizations can lessen their profile in the eyes of these U.S. agencies. Conversely, any increase in violence and/or the killing of U.S. police or civilians would dramatically increase federal scrutiny and retaliation.

The second reason violence has not crossed the border wholesale is that gangs like BA are in place to enforce the drug-trafficking organizations’ rules. The need to send cartel members into the United States to kill a disobedient drug dealer is reduced by having a tight alliance with a border gang that keeps drugs and money moving smoothly and carries out the occasional killing to maintain order.

But the continued integrity of BA and its ability to carry out the writ of larger drug-trafficking organizations in Mexico might not be so certain. The Nov. 3 trial will undermine BA activity in the crucial trafficking corridor of El Paso/Ciudad Juarez.

The indictment and possible incarceration of the six alleged BA members would not damage the gang so badly — after all, BA is accustomed to operating out of prison, and there must certainly be members on the outside ready to fill in for their incarcerated comrades. But making BA’s activities and modus operandi public should increase scrutiny on the gang and could very well lead to many more arrests.

In light of the presence of at least two FBI informants in the gang, BA leaders have probably moved into damage control mode, isolating members jeopardized by the informants. This will disrupt BA’s day-to-day operations, making it at least temporarily less effective. Stratfor sources say BA members on both sides of the border have been ordered to lie low until the trial is over and the damage can be fully assessed. This is a dangerous period for gangs like BA, as their influence over their territory and ability to operate is being reduced.

Weakening BA by extension weakens the Juarez cartel’s hand in El Paso. While BA no doubt will survive the investigations the trial probably will spawn, given the high stakes across the border in Mexico, the Juarez cartel might be forced to reduce its reliance on BA. This could prompt the Juarez cartel to rely on its own members in Ciudad Juarez to carry out hits in the United States and to provide its own security to leaders seeking refuge in the United States. It could also prompt it to turn to a new gang facing less police scrutiny. Under either scenario, BA’s territory would be encroached upon. And considering the importance of controlling territory to prison gangs — and the fact that BA probably still will be largely intact — this could lead to increased rivalries and violence.

The Juarez cartel-BA dynamic could well apply to alliances between U.S. gangs and Mexican drug-trafficking organizations, such as Hermanos de Pistoleros Latinos in Houston, the Texas Syndicate and Tango Blast operating in the Rio Grande Valley and their allies in the Gulf cartel; the Mexican Mafia in California and Texas and its allies in the Tijuana and Sinaloa cartels; and other gangs operating in the United States with ties to Mexican cartels like Mexikanemi, Norteños and the Sureños.

Ultimately, just because BA or any other street gang working with Mexican cartels is weakened does not mean that the need to enforce cartel rules and supply chains disappears. This could put Mexican drug-trafficking organizations on a collision course with U.S. law enforcement if they feel they must step in themselves to take up the slack. As their enforcers stateside face more legal pressure, the cartels’ response therefore bears watching.

Tell Stratfor What You Think

This report may be forwarded or republished on your website with attribution to www.stratfor.com

Please feel free to distribute this Intelligence Report to friends or repost to your Web site linking to www.stratfor.com .

                          ==========

LAO Report: California’s Fiscal Outlook–LAO Projections 2008-09 Through 2013-14

The Legislative Analyst’s Office has just issued the following report:

California’s Fiscal Outlook: LAO Projections 2008-09 Through 2013-14

The state’s struggling economy has severely reduced expected revenues. Combined with rising state expenses, we project that the state will need $27.8 billion in budget solutions over the 2008-09 and 2009-10 fiscal years. The state’s revenue collapse is so dramatic and the underlying economic factors are so weak that we forecast huge budget shortfalls through 2013-14 absent corrective action. From 2010-11 through 2013-14, we project annual shortfalls that are consistently in the range of $22 billion. Closing a projected $28 billion budget shortfall will be a monumental task. We believe the Legislature must take major ongoing actions by both reducing base spending and increasing revenues. If the Legislature has any hope of developing a fiscally responsible 2009–10 budget, it must begin laying the groundwork now. (49 pp.)

Available at the following URL:

http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/PubDetails.aspx?id=1895

                          ==========

And now for the important news …. 

By Argus Hamilton

Somali pirates hijacked a Saudi Arabian oil super-tanker off the east coast of Africa Monday with three million barrels of oil. There’s no reason to attack. At the rate the price of oil is falling the pirates will be out of business in two weeks.

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com

                          ==========

three thousand words

Mikhaela Reid: extreme makeover, conservative pundit edition

http://tinyurl.com/5swqxw (editorialcartoonists.com)

Steve Benson: … a third clinton term instead

http://tinyurl.com/6nbg3w (www.azcentral.com)

Pat Oliphant: … let’s put it in the bank.  It’ll be safe there.

http://img.slate.com/media/1/081120_ed.gif

Friday November 21, 2008 – “Your philosophy determines whether you will go for the disciplines or continue the errors.” – Jim Rohn.

Friday, November 21st, 2008

Bush Administration Purging Whistleblowers?

Thursday, November 20, 2008

The Washington Post on Tuesday published a piece titled “Administration Moves to Protect Key Appointees: Political Positions Shifted to Career Civil Service Jobs”:

http://tinyurl.com/6yhyzw (www.washingtonpost.com/)

Parallel to this process, some whistleblowers and government workers are apparently being forced out.

MARSHA COLEMAN-ADEBAYO, NoFearCoalition@aol.com,

http://johnsonmustgo.org/marsha

Coleman-Adebayo is a senior policy analyst and whistleblower at the EPA. She has recently received a notice of proposed removal. Congressman Chris Van Hollen has written a letter to EPA administrator Stephen Johnson, stating: “Given that Dr. Coleman-Adebayo has several complaints currently pending against the EPA … I urge you to reconsider the Notice of Proposed Removal …” Coleman-Adebayo is president of the No Fear Institute. She said today: “[The Bush administration is] embedding their foot soldiers inside the government in order to sabotage any Obama initiatives while at the same time terminating federal employees who they assume would be supportive of the new administration.” Coleman-Adebayo is in contact with many other current and former government whistleblowers.

For background and a list of other whistleblowers and others apparently being forced out, see:

http://tinyurl.com/653j9y (www.afterdowningstreet.org)

From: Institute for Public Accuracy

                          ==========

HOW OUR GUTLESS MEDIA HELPED TRIGGER THE CREDIT CRISIS 

By Trudy Lieberman, Columbia Journalism Review

Government and greedy bankers aren’t the only ones to blame.

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/102963/

                          ==========

CFTC.gov Press Releases Update

Monday, November 17, 2008

Press Release# 5570-08 , Former Enserco Energy Trader Matthew Reed to Pay $475,000 to Settle CFTC Charges of False Reporting and Attempted Manipulation of Natural Gas Prices, November 17, 2008

http://tinyurl.com/5m9kro (www.cftc.gov)

CFTC Press Release 5571-08

CFTC Charges Former Energy Trader David P. Lee with Fraud for Mis-Marking Bank of Montreal’s Natural Gas Options Book to Exaggerate Trading Profitability; Kevin Cassidy and Others Charged with Assisting Lee in the Fraud

http://tinyurl.com/6xesut (www.cftc.gov)

                          ==========

EIA, the Nation’s clearinghouse for energy statistics – This Week in Petroleum (TWIP)

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

This Week in Petroleum (TWIP) has been updated to the EIA website:

 

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/twip/twip.asp

                          ==========

Firms Say Conditions Continue to Deteriorate – Philadelphia Fed

Thursday, November 20, 2008

The following information is now available on the Philadelphia Fed’s website:

Firms Say Conditions Continue to Deteriorate

November 20, 2008 — Conditions in the region’s manufacturing sector continued to deteriorate in November, according to firms polled for the Business Outlook Survey. The general activity index decreased from -37.5 in October to -39.3. In the special questions, firms were asked about their expectations for changes in their firms’ production levels in the fourth quarter and for employment over the next six months.

http://tinyurl.com/6mox7g (www.philadelphiafed.org)

                          ==========

Savage: “[T]here’s gonna be a wholesale firing of competent white men in the United States government”

On his radio show, Michael Savage said, “I am telling you that there’s gonna be a wholesale firing of competent white men in the United States government up and down the line, in police departments, in fire departments. Everywhere in America, you’re going to see an exchange that you’ve never seen in history, and it’s not gonna be necessarily for the betterment of this country.”

Read More

http://mediamatters.org/items/200811190016?lid=760664&rid=18030782

                          ==========

War and Deceptive Spinning Are Over… Not

Source: New York Times “City Room” blog, November 12, 2008

“Public relations firms across the country predict massive layoffs in the coming months due to recent legislation outlawing the firms’ most lucrative practices,” according to an article in a spoof edition of the New York Times, dated July 4, 2009. The real Times reports, “In an elaborate hoax, pranksters distributed thousands of copies … Wednesday morning at busy subway stations around the city.” The lead story of the spoof paper is “Iraq War Ends.” Other stories detailed similar wonders, including “national health care, a rebuilt economy, progressive taxation, [and] a national oil fund to study climate change.” The spoof “special edition” Times is also online, where it ‘reports’ that “new regulations carefully scrutinize government contracts with for-profit public relations companies. … The new rules would have forbidden the creation of the National Smokers Alliance, a front group formed by Philip Morris with the help of P.R. giant Burson Marsteller.” The spoof paper has been linked to the Yes Men, a political satire group that’s previously targeted the World Trade Organization and Dow Chemical Company.

                          ==========

NEW PULSE POSTED

Monday, November 17, 2008

That’s the url to the Nov. 17, 2008, issue of DOE Pulse. Pulse is a newsletter about accomplishments at the Department of Energy’s national laboratories. Here is some of what you’ll find in this issue:

* SLAC: SPEAR points

* Oak Ridge: Petaflops

* Idaho: Tech for Mars life search

* Sandia: Iraq cleanup aid

Feature: Sandia’s NINE promotes nanotech research

Researcher profiles: Brookhaven video-game pioneer Peter Takacs; Lindau experience

                          ==========

And now for the important news ….

By Argus Hamilton

Los Angeles suburbs got swept by wildfires Sunday that burned down hundreds of hillside homes. Evacuation was slow. Stockbrokers and investment bankers who woke up Sunday morning and saw the flames outside their windows just assumed they had died.

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com

                          ==========

three thousand words

Matt Davies: Expert Advice

http://tinyurl.com/5awx2q (davies.lohudblogs.com)

Cartoon du Jour – By Khalil: sign of the times

http://tinyurl.com/6doaqs (www.bendib.com)

Matt Bors: hey, rich republicans! …

http://tinyurl.com/6qr2ex (editorialcartoonists.com)

Thursday November 20, 2008 – “The place where optimism most flourishes is the lunatic asylum.” – Havelock Ellis

Thursday, November 20th, 2008

To Generate Revenue, Tax the Casino

CHUCK COLLINS, Chuckcollins7@mac.com,

http://extremeinequality.org

Collins is senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies, where he coordinates the Working Group on Extreme Inequality. He wrote the piece “A Fair Plan to Pay for Economic Recovery,” which states: “The corporations that rigged the casino economy and the wealthy CEOs and investors that profited at everyone else’s expense should bear the recovery costs, not our kids and grandchildren.”

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081006/collins

Among Collins’ specific proposals:

“Institute a Financial Transactions Tax. Congress should levy a tax on financial transactions such as sale and purchase of stock and more exotic transactions such as credit default swaps, options, and futures. The UK has a modest financial transaction tax of 0.25 percent, a penny on every $4 invested. This is negligible for a long-term investor, but imposes a cost on the fast-buck flippers. Estimated annual revenue: $100 billion. …

“Eliminate the Tax Preference for Capital Gains. Wealth extracted from Wall Street windfalls will pay out income for years to come. There’s no economic reason for taxing income from corporate dividends and capital gains at 15 percent while taxing income from actual work at 35 percent. Taxing wealth and work at the same rates would generate $95 billion a year in revenue. …

“Eliminate Taxpayer Subsidies for Excessive CEO Pay. Five loopholes that benefit top executives should be abolished. These include eliminating offshore deferred compensation, capping the tax deductibility of excessive pay and eliminating double standards for stock option accounting. Closing these tax loopholes would generate $20 billion a year. …

“Close Offshore Corporate Tax Havens. Congress should prevent corporations from playing games by claiming expenses in the United States and profits in countries that don’t collect taxes. According to the Government Accountability Office, two-thirds of U.S. corporations paid no corporate income tax between 1998 and 2005. Closing this loophole would generate over $100 billion.”

Collins’ books include “Robin Hood Was Right” and, with William H. Gates Sr., “Wealth and Our Commonwealth: Why America Should Tax Accumulated Fortunes.”

From: Institute for Public Accuracy

                          ==========

MAPI: U.S. In Recession, Faces Subpar Growth In ’09

Edited by Manufacturing.net Staff
Manufacturing.Net – November 18, 2008

ARLINGTON, Va. — The U.S. economy is in the midst of a severe recession and will face serious and unrelenting challenges through 2009, according to the Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI Quarterly Economic Forecast report.

“The financial crisis worsened dramatically in the last three months and consumers suffered a major decline in wealth from declining housing prices and the plummeting stock market,” said Daniel J. Meckstroth, Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI Chief Economist.  “High inflation, lower wage increases, and a shrinking number of jobs made individuals poorer and looking for ways to build some savings to weather hard times.  A consumer–led decline aggravated by a credit crunch is a recipe for trouble.”

Manufacturing production growth will sink into negative territory in 2008, declining 1.4 percent following an already low 1.7 percent growth in 2007.  It is likely to fall further in 2009, declining by a significant 4.2 percent. The previous quarterly MAPI report had forecast production to decline by 0.5 percent in 2008 and to grow by 1.6 percent next year.

Production in non-high-tech industries is anticipated to decline 2.9 percent this year and fall an additional 6.3 percent in 2009. There is, however, continued growth in the computers and electronics products sector. High-tech industrial production is expected to rise 14.4 percent in 2008 and 6.6 percent in 2009, although the latter is down from 14.7 percent in the August MAPI report.

The GDP account for inflation-adjusted investment in equipment and software should decrease by 1.5 percent in 2008 and further decrease by 9.2 percent in 2009.  Even previously strong capital equipment spending in high-tech sectors will feel the pinch.  Inflation-adjusted expenditures for information processing equipment are expected to rise 6.8 percent in 2008 before declining 4.6 percent in 2009, down from 8.1 percent and 5.7 percent growth, respectively, in the August report.

In addition, the forecast calls for industrial equipment expenditures to decline by 4.1 percent this year and to further decline by 15.4 percent in 2009.  The latter figure compares with a previously anticipated 7.1 percent loss in 2009 in the August report.  The outlook for spending on transportation equipment calls for a 26.4 percent decline in 2008 followed by a 20.2 percent drop in 2009.

Exports and imports, however, may offer some minimal relief in the soft economic environment.  Export growth should continue to outpace that of imports by a wide margin.  Inflation-adjusted exports should rise 8.4 percent in 2008 and by 0.9 percent in 2009, while imports are expected to decline by 2.4 percent this year and to further decrease by 4.6 percent next year.

The report, however, does include some semblance of good news.  The price per barrel of imported crude oil is expected to average $94.80 in 2008 before falling to $54.50 per barrel in 2009.  This compares favorably to the estimates of $105.80 and $104.80, respectively, in the August outlook.

To view the economic forecast tables click here.

http://tinyurl.com/5759a7 (www.mapi.net)

                          ==========

How Healthy Are Those Supersized Mergers For The Economy?

By MWC NEWS

On September 17th Dean Lawrence Velvel of the Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, wrote an essay on the growth and effect of unregulated, uncontrolled corporate gigantism over the last 50 years.  The article was especially pertinent to the events then unfolding because, though the economic disaster engulfing us occurred because of huge size, even huger combinations of companies were taking place as the supposed remedy for problems which had been brought on in the first place by huge size — problems which could not have occurred but for huge size, almost always resulting from corporate combinations.  Now, more such combinations, and even bigger ones, have been considered (e.g., Chrysler and GM), though the supposed remedies implemented to date are proving ineffective. Dean Velvel’s essay on corporate size is, if anything, even more relevant now than two months ago.  You therefore might wish to carry it.

Re:The Bigger The Company, The More Disastrous The Mistake

By Lawrence Velvel

In younger days I was an antitrust lawyer for a considerable number of years.  Most of my work, and my cast of mind, was on the plaintiff’s side.  This mentality meant, and means to this day, that I favor views expressed by Justices Brandeis and Douglas:  Antitrust is not simply about claimed efficiency that supposedly makes things better for consumers.  The claims of efficiency are often false and consumers often get the short end of the stick.  Rather than being solely about supposed efficiency, antitrust is also about fairness towards competitors, about the virtues of smallness in preference to corporate elephantiasis, about maintaining democracy by preserving economic opportunity for the small man or woman. 

The Brandeisian-Douglas view has not prevailed in the last 30 to 40 years.  Instead, with some of the most famous names in American law as the tip of the spear (in military terms), the field was taken over by, and federal judges learned from and implemented the views of, the economics boys — famous professors and judges who claimed that economics were all that mattered and that they, with their verbal facility and occasional mathematical models, could tell us which principles of economics to apply.

The result has been the virtual death of antitrust under the guise of making it more sophisticated.  Colossal mergers, legalized price fixing, forcing unwanted products upon buyers as the price of purchasing other products which they do want, are the order of the day.  The consumer and the small man or woman exists to be screwed over.

One of the ideas of the economics ist alles boys (economics is all boys) has been that corporate giganticism, whether achieved by mergers, buyouts, internal growth or howsomever, represents a desirable triumph of . . . . something.  Maybe a triumph of efficiency, maybe a triumph of cost savings, maybe, if corporations in different fields are melded, a triumph of smoothing out overall corporate earnings cycles because one field will be up when the other is down, maybe a triumph of the idea that huge size and diversification would enable American companies (especially financial ones) to compete more effectively with European and Japanese ones.  Creating corporate giganticism had to be a triumph, the economics boys said, because, if it weren’t desirable, then hard-headed businessmen wouldn’t do it.

Well, one triumph of giganticism was for certain.  It was a triumph of the economics boys’ theories, verbal fluency and even mathematical claims, over reality.  Ignoring reality, the economics boys didn’t consider that high executives from one of the previously separate corporations would be at loggerheads with executives from the other, that from top to bottom the cultures of melded corporations wouldn’t mesh, that cost savings wouldn’t materialize, that earnings would not be smoothed out, that purchasing corporations wouldn’t know how to make good use of acquired corporations, that different industries require very different mentalities, that size was achieved by destroying highly innovative, often new companies, that companies make acquisitions not because this creates better economic entities but because it creates more power, more prestige and vast compensation for high executives, that people, including businessmen, do not act solely in accordance with the presumed economic dictates governing the rational economic man whose motivation the economics boys (falsely) like to posit as the only one to be considered, that the stock of the merged entity would tank, that ultimately there would have to be massive demerging (if I may call it that). 

Nor did the economics boys reckon with another point, a point which is assailing us big time today, even as this is written, a point which is the very reason this is being written.  The purveyors of economics ist alles did not consider that, when you create gigantic corporate organizations, you are in bigger trouble if one or a few of them make terrible mistakes or fail than if the organizations making mistakes or failing are only one third or one quarter the size. 

Today there is a crisis on Wall Street.  It involves enormous losses.  It threatens the economy.  One reason it is of such magnitude is that the institutions of Wall Street were allowed to become so huge.  They are so big that their mistakes and their failures threaten all of us. 

Complete article at:

http://tinyurl.com/659zzj (mwcnews.net)

                          ==========

OUR ECONOMY MAY BE IN A DEATH SPIRAL — WILL WASHINGTON STOP THE BLEEDING?

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet

The Bush-Paulson plan isn’t doing anything to address the underlying problems threatening America’s economic future.

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/106993/

                          ==========

Oversight of Implementation of Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

House Financial Services Committee – Oversight of Implementation of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and of Government Lending and Insurance Facilities; Impact on Economy and Credit Availability Tuesday, November 18, 2008

http://tinyurl.com/5tomyq (www.house.gov)

                          ==========

CBO Cost Estimate for S. 3689, Economic Recovery Act of 2008

S. 3689, Economic Recovery Act of 2008 – November 18, 2008 – Cost estimate for the bill as introduced on November 17, 2008.

“CBO estimates that enacting this legislation would provide $89.3 billion in budget authority and result in outlays totaling $50.4 billion in 2009 and $88.4 billion over the 2009-2018 period— excluding potential additional costs for automobile industry assistance under title VI of the bill. (CBO cannot estimate the net incremental cost of enacting title VI at this time.) In addition, CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimate that enacting this bill would result in a loss of revenues totaling $10.9 billion over the 2009-2018 period.”

http://tinyurl.com/6lm47f (www.cbo.gov)

                          ==========

On G-20 and GM: Economics, Politics and Social Stability

November 17, 2008

By George Friedman

The G-20 met last Saturday. Afterward, the group issued a meaningless statement and decided to meet again in March 2009, or perhaps later. Clearly, the urgency of October is gone. First, the perception of imminent collapse is past. Politicians are superb seismographs for detecting impending disaster, and these politicians did not act as if they were running out of time. Second, the United States will have a new president in March, and nothing can be done until he defines his policy.

Given the sense in Europe that this financial crisis marked the end of U.S. economic supremacy, it is ironic that the Europeans are waiting on the Americans. One would think they would be using their newfound ascendancy to define the new international system. But the fact is that for all the shouting, little has changed in the international order. The crisis has receded sufficiently that nothing more needs to be done immediately beyond “cooperation,” and nothing can be done until the United States defines what will be done. We feel that our view that the international system received fatal blows Aug. 8, when Russia and Georgia went to war, and Oct. 11, when the G-7 meeting ended without a single integrated solution, remains unchallenged. Now, it is every country for itself.

From Financial Crisis to Cyclical Recession

The financial crisis has been mitigated, if not solved. The problem now is that we are in a cyclical recession, and that every country is trying to figure out how to cope with the recession. Unlike the past two recessions, this one is more global than local. But unlike the 1970s, when recession was global, this one is not accompanied by soaring inflation and interest rates.

All recessions have different dynamics, but all have one thing in common: They impose punishment and discipline on economies run wild. This is happening around the world.

China, for example, faces a serious problem. China is an export-oriented economy whose primary market is the United States. As the United States goes into recession, demand for Chinese goods declines. Chinese businesses have always operated on very tight — sometimes invisible — profit margins designed to emphasize cash flow and to pay off debts to banks. As U.S. demand contracts, many Chinese firms find themselves in untenable positions, without room to decrease prices, lacking operating reserves and insufficiently capitalized. Recessions are designed to cull the weak from the herd, and a huge swath of the Chinese economy is ripe for the culling.

If the world were all about economics, culling is what the Chinese would do. But the world is more complex than that. A culling would lead to massive unemployment. Many Chinese employees live on Third World wages; indeed, the vast majority of Chinese have incomes of less than $1,000 a year. To them, unemployment doesn’t mean problems with their 401k. It means malnutrition and desperation — neither of which is unknown in 20th century Chinese history, including the Communist period. The Chinese government is rightly worried about the social and political consequences of rational economic policies: They might work in the long run, but only if you live that long.

Economic Restructuring vs. Stability

The Chinese have therefore prepared a massive stimulus package that is more of a development program to make up for declining U.S. demand. It aims to keep businesses from failing and spilling millions of angry and hungry workers into the street. For the Chinese, the economic problem creates a much larger and more serious issue. It is also an issue that must be solved quickly, and the amount of time needed outstrips the amount of time available.

This is not only a Chinese problem. Wherever there is an economic downturn, politicians must decide whether society — and their own political futures — can withstand the rigors recessions impose. Recessions occur when, as is inevitable, inefficiencies and irrationalities build up in the financial and economic system. The resulting economic downturn imposes a harsh discipline that destroys the inefficient, encourages everyone to become more efficient, and opens the doors to new businesses using new technologies and business models. The year 2001 smashed the technology sector in the United States, opening the door for Google Inc.

The business cycle works well, but the human costs can be daunting. The collapse of inefficient businesses leaves workers without jobs, investors without money and society less stable than before. The pain needed to rectify China’s economy would be enormous, with devastating consequences for hundreds of millions of Chinese, and probably would lead to social chaos. Beijing is prepared to accept a high degree of economic inefficiency to avoid, or at least postpone, the reckoning. The reckoning always comes, but for most of us, later is better than sooner. Economic rationality takes a back seat to social necessity and political common sense.

Every country in the world is looking inward at the impact of the recession on its economy and measuring its resources. Countries are deciding whether they have the ability to prop up business that should fail, what the social consequences of business failure would be, and whether they should try to use their resources to avoid the immediate pain of recession. This is why the G-20 ended in meaningless platitudes.

Each country is also trying to answer the question of how much pain it — and its regime — can endure. The more pain imposed, the healthier countries will emerge economically — unless of course the pain kills them. Ultimately, the rationality of economics and the reality of society frequently diverge.

Recession and the U.S. Auto Industry

For the United States, this choice has been posed in stark terms with regard to the dilemma of whether the U.S. government should use its resources to rescue the American auto industry. The American auto industry was once the centerpiece of the U.S. economy. That hasn’t been true for a generation, as other industries and services have supplanted it and other countries’ auto industries have surpassed it. Nevertheless, the U.S. auto industry remains important. It might drain the U.S. economy by losing vast amounts of money and destroying the equity held by its investors, but it employs large numbers of people. Perhaps more important, it purchases supplies from literally thousands of U.S. companies.

There can be endless discussions of why the U.S. auto industry is in such trouble. The answer lies not in one place but in many, from the decisions and makeup of management to the unions that control much of the workforce, and from the cost structure inherent in producing cars in the American economy to a simple systemic inability to produce outstanding vehicles. There might be varying degrees of truth to all or some of this, but the fact remains that each of the U.S. carmakers is on the verge of financial collapse.

This is what recessions are supposed to do. As in China and everywhere else, recessions reveal weak businesses and destroy them, freeing up resources for new enterprises. This recession has hit the auto industry hard, and it is unlikely that it is going to survive. The ultimate reason is the same one that destroyed the U.S. steel industry a generation ago: Given U.S. cost structures, producing commodity products is best left to countries with lower wage rates, while more expensive U.S. labor is deployed in more specialized products requiring greater expertise. Thus, there is still steel production in the United States, but it is specialty steel production, not commodity steel. Similarly, there will be specialty auto production in the United States, but commodity auto production will come from other countries.

That sounds easy, but the transition actually will be a bloodletting. Current employees of both the automakers and suppliers will be devastated. Institutions that have lent money to the automakers will suffer massive or total losses. Pensioners might lose pensions and health care benefits, and an entire region of the United States — the industrial Midwest — will be devastated. Something stronger will grow eventually, but not in time for many of the current employees, shareholders and creditors.

Here the economic answer, cull, meets the social answer, stabilize. Policymakers have a decision to make. If the automakers fail now, their drain on the economy will end; the pain will be shorter, if more intense; and new industries would emerge more quickly. But though their drain on the economy would end, the impact of the automakers’ failure on the economy would be seismic. Unemployment would surge, as would bankruptcies of many auto suppliers. Defaults on loans would hit the credit markets. In the Midwest, home prices would plummet and foreclosures would skyrocket. And heaven only knows what the impact on equity markets would be.

In the U.S. case, the healthful purgative of a recession could potentially put the patient in a coma. Few if any believe the U.S. auto industry can survive in its current form. But there is an emerging consensus in Washington that the auto industry must not be allowed to fail now. The argument for spending money on the auto industry is not to save it, but to postpone its failure until a less devastating and inconvenient time. In other words, fearing the social and political consequences of a recession working itself through to its logical conclusion, Washington — like Beijing — wants to spend money it probably won’t recover to postpone the failure. Indeed, governments around the world are considering what failures to tolerate, what failures to postpone, and how much to spend on the latter. General Motors is merely the American case in point.

The Recession in Context

The people arguing for postponement aren’t foolish. The financial system is still working its way through a massive crisis that had little to do with the auto industry. Some traction appears to be occurring; certainly there was no crisis atmosphere at the G-20 meeting. The economy is in recession, but in spite of the inevitable claims that we have never seen anything like this one before, we have. There is always some variable that swings to an extreme — this time, it is consumer spending — but we are still well within the framework of recent recessions.

Consider the equity markets, which we regard as a long-term measure of the market’s evaluation of the state of the economy. In January 2000, the S&P 500 peaked at 1,455. This was the top of the market. In July 2002, 18 months later, the S&P bottomed out at 935. Over the next five years it rose to 1,519 in July 2007, the height for this cycle. It fell from this point until Nov. 12, 2008, when it closed at 852.30. This past Friday, it was at 873.29.

We do not know what the market will do in the future. There are people much smarter than we are who claim to know that. What we do know is what it has done. And what it has done this time — so far — is almost exactly what it did last time, except that in 2000-2002 it took 18 months to do it, while this time it was done in about 16 and a half months (assuming it bottomed out Nov. 12). But even if the market didn’t bottom out then, and it falls to 775, for example, it will have lost 50 percent of its value from the peak. This would be more than in 2000-2002, but not unprecedented.

The point we are making here is that if we regard the equity markets as a long-term seismograph of the economy, then so far, despite all the storm and stress, the markets — and therefore the economy — remain within the general pattern of the 2000-2002 market at the 2001 recession. That recession certainly was unpleasant, what with the devastation of the tech sector, but the economy survived. At the same time, however, it is clear that things are balanced on a knife’s edge. Another hundred points’ fall on the S&P, and the markets will be telling us that the world is in a very different place indeed.

A massive bankruptcy in the automotive sector could certainly set the stage for an economic renaissance in the next generation. But at this particular moment in time (it’s no coincidence that the crisis in the U.S. automotive industry comes as we enter a recession), a wave of bankruptcies would dramatically deepen the recession. This probably would be reflected by the destruction of trillions more in net worth in the equity markets.

There is a powerful counterargument to bailing out the U.S. auto industry. This argument holds that the auto industry is a drain on the U.S. economy, that it will never be globally competitive, and that if it is dragged back from the edge, no one will then say it is time to push it to the edge and over. The next time it will be on the brink will be during the next recession, and the same argument to save it will be used. In due course, the United States, like China, will be so terrified of the social and political consequences of business failure that it will maintain Chinese-like state owned enterprises, full of employees and generation-old plants and business models. Clearly, short-run solutions can easily become long-term albatrosses.

The only possible solution would be a bailout followed by a Washington-administered restructuring of the auto industry. This causes us to imagine a collaboration between the auto industry’s current management and Washington administrators that would finally put Detroit on a path to where it can compete with Toyota. Frankly, the mind boggles at this. But boggle though we might, hitting the economy with another massive financial default, a wave of bankruptcies, massive unemployment surges and another blow to housing prices boggles our mind even more.

The geopolitical problem confronting the world at the moment is that it has been forced to offer massive support to the global financial system with sovereign wealth — e.g., via taxes and currency printing presses. The world might just have squeaked through that crisis. Now, the world is in an inevitable recession and businesses are on the brink of failure. A wave of massive business failures on top of the financial crisis might well move the global system to a very different place. Therefore, each nation, by itself and indifferent to others, is in the process of figuring out how to postpone these failures to a more opportune time — or to never. This will build in long-term inefficiencies to the global economy, but right now everyone will be quite content with that.

Thus the financial crisis became a recession, and the recession triggered bankruptcies. And because no one wants bankruptcies right now, everyone who can is using taxpayer dollars to protect the taxpayer from the consequences of mismanagement. And the last thing any one cared about was the G-20 concept for the future of the economic system.

This report may be forwarded or republished on your website with attribution to www.stratfor.com

Please feel free to distribute this Intelligence Report to friends or repost to your Web site linking to www.stratfor.com .

                          ==========

That was then … Matthews lauded “experience” of Bush’s Cabinet picks in 2001, but says Obama’s selection of prior administration vets is “crap”

Amid reports that President-elect Barack Obama has decided to nominate Clinton Justice Department veteran Eric Holder to be attorney general, Chris Matthews criticized Obama on Hardball: “You could do this in any bureaucratic state, you could do it in the old Soviet Union. … You don’t need elections for this crap.” But in 2001, Matthews said of George W. Bush’s Cabinet picks, which included veterans of past administrations: “There’s some real heavyweights in terms of experience.”

Read More

http://mediamatters.org/items/200811180018?lid=757141&rid=17970886

                          ==========

Borowitz Report – Obama Controversy Shocker

November 18, 2008

Obama’s Use of Complete Sentences Stirs Controversy
Stunning Break with Last Eight Years
 

In the first two weeks since the election, President-elect Barack Obama has broken with a tradition established over the past eight years through his controversial use of complete sentences, political observers say.

Millions of Americans who watched Mr. Obama’s appearance on CBS’ “Sixty Minutes” on Sunday witnessed the president-elect’s unorthodox verbal tick, which had Mr. Obama employing grammatically correct sentences virtually every time he opened his mouth.

But Mr. Obama’s decision to use complete sentences in his public pronouncements carries with it certain risks, since after the last eight years many Americans may find his odd speaking style jarring.

According to presidential historian Davis Logsdon of the University of Minnesota, some Americans might find it “alienating” to have a President who speaks English as if it were his first language.

“Every time Obama opens his mouth, his subjects and verbs are in agreement,” says Mr. Logsdon.  “If he keeps it up, he is running the risk of sounding like an elitist.”

The historian said that if Mr. Obama insists on using complete sentences in his speeches, the public may find itself saying, “Okay, subject, predicate, subject predicate – we get it, stop showing off.”

The President-elect’s stubborn insistence on using complete sentences has already attracted a rebuke from one of his harshest critics, Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska.

“Talking with complete sentences there and also too talking in a way that ordinary Americans like Joe the Plumber and Tito the Builder can’t really do there, I think needing to do that isn’t tapping into what Americans are needing also,” she said.

Upcoming Events

January 1, 2009 at 12:01AM
Andy’s 2009 Shows
Watch this space for Andy’s performances in 2009.

http://www.borowitzreport.com/

                          ==========

three thousand words

David Horsey: … and you knowwhy we’re going bankrupt? …

http://tinyurl.com/5835nv (seattlepi.nwsource.com)

Steve Benson: Shed Some Light

http://img.slate.com/media/68/081118_ed.gif

Cameron Cardow: Apple iCar

http://www.cagle.com/working/081118/cam.jpg

Wednesday November 19, 2008 – “So this is how liberty dies. With thunderous applause.” – George Lucas

Wednesday, November 19th, 2008

Auto Bailout

MARK BRENNER, mark@labornotes.org, http://www.labornotes.org

Director of Labor Notes, an independent periodical on labor based in Detroit, Brenner said today: “At every turn, executives at the ‘Big Three’ have demonstrated that they will chase the quick returns instead of looking out for what’s coming down the road. When they should have been focused on hybrids or even more bold alternatives, they were pumping out SUVs and other gas-guzzlers. We can’t count on them to solve this. They are part of the problem, not the solution.

“When it comes to the auto bailout we can’t approach this piecemeal. Giving money to the same people who got us into this mess — with no strings attached and no direction from the federal government — will be a disaster. If ever there was a time to completely rethink our approach to transportation and how we create good, environmentally sustainable jobs, now is it. But we have to start from what we need, not what the auto executives or their shareholders need.

“If the government is interested in immediate relief for the auto industry, now is the time for a game-changing move on healthcare. GM spends almost $5 billion on healthcare and is responsible for the healthcare of about a million active workers, retirees, and family members. The auto industry is Exhibit A for why we need a national, single-payer healthcare system.”

From: Institute for Public Accuracy

                          ==========

BAILOUT TALLY: $3.8 TRILLION AND COUNTING

By Faiz Shakir, Think Progress

“Three-point eight trillion dollars. That’s.$3,800,000.000.000. More than what was spent on WW II, if adjusted for inflation.”

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/workplace/107431/

                          ==========

CBO Background Paper: The Outlook for Housing Starts, 2009 to 2012 November 2008

Background Paper: The Outlook for Housing Starts, 2009 to 2012, November 2008

“This background paper examines the various factors that have determined the number of housing starts in the United States in the past and will continue to determine it in the future. Those factors include the underlying demand for new housing units, especially the role of demographics; cyclical and financial conditions, such as unemployment rates and lending standards; and the number of excess vacant units. CBO expects that housing starts will fall far enough below underlying demand for a long enough period to eliminate the current glut of vacant units and any temporary shortfall of demand due to adverse cyclical and financial conditions; this paper presents three alternative scenarios that could achieve that outcome.”

http://tinyurl.com/5nbglv (www.cbo.gov)

                          ==========

NAOMI KLEIN: THE BORDERLINE ILLEGAL DEALS BEHIND THE $700 BILLION BAILOUT

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!

The bailout is a parting gift to the people that George Bush once referred to jokingly as “my base.”

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/107458/

                          ==========

FTC Issues 2008 Report on U.S. Ethanol Market Concentration

News release: “The Commission has issued the report, 2008 Report on Ethanol Market Concentration. This is the Commission’s fourth annual report on the state of ethanol production in the United States, as required by the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The report concludes that the U.S. fuel ethanol market, measured on the basis of production or capacity, remains unconcentrated.”

http://tinyurl.com/6dtcb4 (www.ftc.gov)

Obama’s biofuels policy tension … and more

BBC News

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7529015.stm

By Roger Harrabin, BBC environment analyst 

July 28, 2008

US presidential hopeful Barack Obama is coming under increasing pressure to change his policies on biofuels.

Senator Obama has been a big supporter of corn subsidies for American farmers to produce the plant-fuel ethanol.

But a new report from his own green adviser warns of the many problems associated with the biofuel.

DANIEL KAMMEN’s paper says that a car will emit more greenhouse gases driving on corn ethanol processed with coal than it will using normal petrol.

THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, PROFESSOR says the boom in subsidised American corn production is driving up the cost of animal feed – and forcing soy production to Brazil where it creates still more greenhouse gases if it is planted on virgin land….

Professor Kammen says much smarter biofuels policies are needed, but admits that the analysis of this highly complex field will prove very difficult….

Ethanol bad for gas, nation, environment

Statesman Journal – Salem,OR,USA

Those who report fuel efficiency losses of only 1-3% from ethanol are using cars designed for ethanol blended fuel. My car is running about 10% fewer mpg, …

http://tinyurl.com/4wqt86 (www.statesmanjournal.com)

More harm than good from ethanol push

Toronto Star – Ontario, Canada

People are pushing for the widespread use of ethanol as a replacement for fossil fuel; in my mind, this is unrealistic. One of the prominent drawbacks of …

http://www.thestar.com/Opinion/article/507351

CEI Report Bashes Ethanol Production

Written on November 16, 2008

EnergyCurrent.com reports that a new Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) report says corn ethanol mandates are a “painful choice” between food, fuel, and wildlife supplies. The report used World Bank statistics when it noted that global food prices have jumped 83% on average during a 36 month period ending this past April.

Ethanol does affect food-price inflation

DesMoinesRegister.com – Des Moines,IA,USA

He suggests that our ethanol policies have had no impact on food prices. As an agricultural economist, I must dispute this oversimplification. …

http://tinyurl.com/562t7q (www.desmoinesregister.com)

                          ==========

EIA, the Nation’s clearinghouse for energy statistics – Today’s Gasoline Prices

Monday, November 17, 2008

RETAIL GASOLINE: (Self Service Prices per Gallon, Including Taxes) This report contains price estimates for gasoline sold in ozone non-attainment areas which require the sale of reformulated gasoline (RFG) as designated by the Environmental Protection Agency, and Conventional areas which includes both attainment areas and carbon monoxide non-attainment areas.

Mogas web site url

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/fwd/wrgp.html

                          ==========

Congressman Paul’s Texas Straight Talk

Monday, November 17, 2008

“As the financial sector continues its tailspin despite efforts to bail out Wall Street, among the few gainers in recent stock trading have been those companies looking for a new “shot in the arm” with government funding from the next administration.  

With its strident rhetoric toward re-establishing the so called “pro-choice” agenda, the incoming administration has threatened a whole host of policies that would not only reduce restrictions on abortion, but would actually force people who wish to avoid participating in the procedure to support it.”

Click here to read the full article:

http://www.house.gov/paul/index.shtml

                          ==========

Gingrich: “[T]here is a gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us”

Discussing actions by individual protesters of Proposition 8, Newt Gingrich stated: “I think there is a gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us, is prepared to use violence, to use harassment. I think it is prepared to use the government if it can get control of it. I think that it is a very dangerous threat to anybody who believes in traditional religion.”

Read More

http://mediamatters.org/items/200811170014?lid=754385&rid=17918840

                          ==========

Satire: Obama Victory Starts Hot New Trend: Palling Around With Terrorists

By R J Shulman

17 Nov 2008

The decisive victory of Barack Obama in the presidential election has made a once taboo topic the talk of the town, associating with a terrorist. “Everybody wants to have their picture taken with a terrorist,” said Sandy Holsteder of US Magazine, “William Ayers has so many invites, he will never have to buy lunch or dinner again.” (Satire)

At:

http://tinyurl.com/5qtv5b (www.legitgov.org)

From: CLG News

                          ==========

And now for the important news …. 

By Argus Hamilton

General Motors went to Congress for bailout help on Friday. The automaker faces a tough choice as gas prices plummet. They can either make low-profit hybrid cars or high-profit SUVs, and GM executives must decide between ribs or burgers for lunch.

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com

                          ==========

three thousand words

Tom Tomorrow: The End of History – Again

http://tinyurl.com/5f3c7y (politicalirony.com)

Matt Davies: free market 2008

http://tinyurl.com/5hw6zt (editorialcartoonists.com)

Bad Reporter(Don Asmussen): the lies behind the truth …

http://tinyurl.com/5evqp6 (www.sfgate.com)